If there is any Marxism in China, it could only come from an 
underground opposition to the vicious fascist animals who rule China, 
the worst exploiters of labor on the planet.

Value theory is not my hobby, but I'm curious to know why it's come 
to a dead end.


At 11:08 AM 8/13/2008, Charles Brown wrote:
> >>> andie nachgeborenen
>
>If there are they aren't contributing much to a theoretical renaissance
>of Marxism visible from the Anglo-American-European world.
>
>^^^^
>CB:  Maybe we can discuss this. I don't see where Marxism needs a
>theoretical renaissance.  It needs a revival in practice, but the
>fundamentals of its analysis of capitalism and history (dare I say
>philosophy ;smile) seem valid.   The world bourgeoisie have won some big
>victories over the world working class, but even in that the basic
>dynamic of class conflict and struggle today are very well described by
>Marxism.  Finance capital is on top of the world with imperialist wars
>regularly waged, just as theoretical Leninism claims, etc.
>
>The main update of Marxism might be that the bourgeoisie have turned
>out to be  more dangerous - with the development of weapons of mass
>destruction and genocidal/anti-communist wars -   than even Marx or
>Lenin warned.


_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to