Democracy and the end of cheap oil
By Grace Lee Boggs
Special to The Michigan Citizen

http://www.michigancitizen.com/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=77&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=6371&wpage=1&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=1070&hn=michigancitizen&he=.com

The shift from an industrialized to an agrarian economy, mandated by the end of 
cheap oil, will not only slow down global warming. Our food will be safer to 
eat and our society more democratic, according to a paper by Maynard Kaufman 
presented at the recent Green Party convention in Chicago.

That’s why we should “actively affirm this as an agrarian revival, and not just 
wait in a passive way for it to happen. If we affirm it, we can plan for it—and 
for the recovery of democracy.”

“The average family of four that buys its food,” Kaufman points out, “uses more 
energy in the food they buy than in the car they drive. The burning of fossil 
fuels such as coal (for electricity), along with oil and natural gas, has long 
been recognized as a source of air pollution with acid rain.

“Other environmental impacts of the industrial food system include soil 
erosion, wasteful use of water, run-off from excessive fertilizer use, manure 
pollution in confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Most of these costs 
are ‘externalized’ into the environment, not included in the price.

“Thus food is cheap in America because many costs are externalized. The annual 
subsidy of $39 billion dollars to the oil industry is not included in the price 
of food. And the cost of war to secure access to oil is also externalized to be 
paid by our children.”

Industrial civilization has also “facilitated the transfer of wealth into fewer 
and fewer hands. Already in 2000 the top 1% of Americans had as much disposable 
income as the bottom 100 million, or 35%.

Thus “the United States is more of a plutocracy than a democracy.”

“We lost our democracy when we were trained to be good consumers of what the 
industrial food system produced. And as long as we had energy slaves to provide 
our food, we did not worry about it. Now we face a new situation as the spike 
in energy prices creates new threats and opens new political possibilities.

Thomas Jefferson promoted this possibility but it was gradually over-shadowed 
by a culture based on manufacturing.

The end of cheap oil re-opens this possibility.

“Rising food prices are already stimulating more people to raise their own or 
seek local farmer’s markets which are popping up in every town. 

“Still another aspect of an agrarian culture will be organic methods of food 
production, working in harmony with nature.”

“An agrarian economy…will be a society with a great deal more informal economic 
activity….It would very likely get us off the treadmill of economic growth and 
into a steady-state society.”

An agrarian society would be a good place or a Eutopia, according to Paul Gilk, 
Wisconsin Green activist in his new book, Politics is Eutopian. A utopian 
society is no place in that it is not grounded in a natural context but exists 
as a man-made imposition of abstract and conceptual mental patterns on the 
natural environment. By contrast, a village (or city) that is rooted in the 
natural environment is a real place where people raise food with organic 
methods and live in harmony with nature.

One of Gilk’s special concerns is the status of women as we move into an 
agrarian way of life. In past agrarian societies work was often gendered with 
women bearing the brunt of drudgery. If feminism can remain strong in a 
post-petroleum society, sexist discrimination may be mitigated. More efficient 
and appropriate technology might also be helpful.

Maynard Kaufman is a retired professor of religion and environmental studies. 
While teaching at Western Michigan University in the 1970s, he became a 
back-to-the-land part-time farmer so that his students could experience 
self-sufficiency and harmony with their environment. In 1991 his involvement in 
the organic movement led him to organize Michigan Organic Food and Farm 
Alliance as a state-wide group promoting local organic food and farming. 
Organic farming does not use chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Thus it uses 
30% less fossil fuel energy. Organic fertilizers also reduce carbon emissions 
because they sequester carbon in the soil.








This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
www.surfcontrol.com

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to