http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/opinion/22observer.html 


The New York Times 

September 22, 2008 


Editorial Observer 


Barack Obama, John McCain and the Language of Race 


By BRENT STAPLES 


It was not that long ago that black people in the Deep South could be 

beaten or killed for seeking the right to vote, talking back to the 

wrong white man or failing to give way on the sidewalk. People of color


who violated these and other proscriptions could be designated "uppity


niggers" and subjected to acts of violence and intimidation that were 

meant to dissuade others from following their examples. 


The term "uppity" was applied to affluent black people, who sometimes 

paid a horrific price for owning nicer homes, cars or more successful 

businesses than whites. Race-based wealth envy was a common trigger for


burnings, lynchings and cataclysmic episodes of violence like the Tulsa


race riot of 1921, in which a white mob nearly eradicated the 

prosperous black community of Greenwood. 


Forms of eloquence and assertiveness that were viewed as laudable among


whites were seen as positively mutinous when practiced by people of 

color. As such, black men and women who looked white people squarely in


the eye -- and argued with them about things that mattered -- were 

declared a threat to the racial order and persecuted whenever possible.



This obsession with black subservience was based in nostalgia for 

slavery. No sane person would openly express such a sentiment today. 

But the discomfort with certain forms of black assertiveness is too 

deeply rooted in the national psyche -- and the national language -- to


just disappear. It has been a persistent theme in the public discourse


since Barack Obama became a plausible candidate for the presidency. 


A blatant example surfaced earlier this month, when a Georgia 

Republican, Representative Lynn Westmoreland, described the Obamas as 

"uppity" in response to a reporter's question. Mr. Westmoreland, who 

actually stood by the term when given a chance to retreat, later tried


to excuse himself by saying that the dictionary definition carried no 

racial meaning. That seems implausible. Mr. Westmoreland is from the 

South, where the vernacular meaning of the word has always been clear.



The Jim Crow South institutionalized racial paternalism in its 

newspapers, which typically denied black adults the courtesy titles of


Mr. and Mrs. -- and reduced them to children by calling them by first 

names only. Representative Geoff Davis, Republican of Kentucky, 

succumbed to the old language earlier this year when describing what he


viewed as Mr. Obama's lack of preparedness to handle nuclear policy. 

"That boy's finger does not need to be on the button," he said. 


In the Old South, black men and women who were competent, confident 

speakers on matters of importance were termed "disrespectful," the 

implication being that all good Negroes bowed, scraped, grinned and 

deferred to their white betters. 


In what is probably a harbinger of things to come, the McCain campaign


has already run a commercial that carries a similar intimation, 

accusing Mr. Obama of being "disrespectful" to Sarah Palin. The 

argument is muted, but its racial antecedents are very clear. 


The throwback references that have surfaced in the campaign suggest 

that Republicans are fighting on racial grounds, even when express 

references to race are not evident. In a replay of elections past, the


G.O.P. will try to leverage racial ghosts and fears without getting its


hands visibly dirty. The Democrats try to parry in customary ways. 


Mr. Obama seems to understand that he is always an utterance away from


a statement -- or a phrase -- that could transform him in a campaign ad


from the affable, rational and racially ambiguous candidate into the 

archetypical angry black man who scares off the white vote. His caution


is evident from the way he sifts and searches the language as he 

speaks, stepping around words that might push him into the danger zone.



These maneuvers are often painful to watch. The troubling part is that


they are necessary. 




This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
www.surfcontrol.com

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to