Commodity fetishism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on 
Marxist theory 
 
Theoretical works[show]
The Communist Manifesto
Das Kapital 
The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon
Grundrisse
The German Ideology 
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
Theses on Feuerbach 
Sociology · Anthropology[show]
Alienation · Bourgeoisie
Class consciousness
Commodity fetishism
Communism · Cultural hegemony
Exploitation · Human nature
Ideology · Proletariat
Reification · Socialism
Relations of production 
Economics[show]
Marxian economics
Labour power · Law of value
Means of production
Mode of production
Productive forces
Surplus labour · Surplus value
Transformation problem
Wage labour 
History[show]
Anarchism and Marxism
Capitalist production
Class struggle
Dictatorship of the proletariat
Primitive capital accumulation
Proletarian revolution
Proletarian internationalism
World revolution 
Philosophy[show]
Historical materialism
Dialectical materialism
Marxist philosophy
Analytical Marxism
Libertarian Marxism
Marxist autonomism
Marxist feminism
Marxist geography
Marxist humanism
Structural Marxism
Western Marxism
Young Marx 
People[show]
Karl Marx · Friedrich Engels
Karl Kautsky · Eduard Bernstein
Georgi Plekhanov · Rosa Luxemburg
Vladimir Lenin · Leon Trotsky
Georg Lukács · Joseph Stalin
Antonio Gramsci · Mao Zedong
Frankfurt School
Louis Althusser · more 
Criticism[show]
Criticisms of Marxism 
Categories[show]
All categorised articles 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Communism portal 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
v ● d ● e 
In Marxist theory, commodity fetishism is a state of social relations,
said to arise in capitalist market based societies, in which social
relationships are transformed into apparently objective relationships
between commodities or money. The term is introduced in the opening
chapter of Karl Marx's main work of political economy, Capital, of 1867
.

As it relates to commodities specifically, commodity fetishism is the
belief that value inheres in commodities instead of being added to them
through labor. This is the root of Marx's critique relating to
conditions surrounding fetishism--that capitalists "fetishize"
commodities, believing that they contain value, and the effects of labor
are misunderstood.

Marx's use of the term fetish can be interpreted as an ironic comment
on the "rational", "scientific" mindset of industrial capitalist
societies. In Marx's day, the word was primarily used in the study of
primitive religions; Marx's "fetishism of commodities" might be seen as
proposing that just such primitive belief systems exist at the heart of
modern society. In most subsequent Marxist thought, commodity fetishism
is defined as an illusion arising from the central role that private
property plays in capitalism's social processes. It is a central
component of the dominant ideology in capitalist societies.

Contents [hide]
1 Marx's argument 
2 After Marx 
3 See also 
4 References 
5 External links 
 


[edit] Marx's argument
According to Marx, people value objects that they can use (i.e. objects
that have "use-value"), and most things people can use are produced
through human labor. In market societies, however, people can use one
object to acquire another through exchange; goods thus take on
"exchange-value". Even when people barter or exchange gifts, such
exchanges can be used to cement or extend social relationships.

In capitalist societies, however, there is a labor market; rather than
being seen as the source of use-values, labor itself becomes another
commodity and takes on an exchange-value. Thus, labor is devalued.
Conversely, commodities are seen as having power over the people who
produce them.

A simple example will illustrate this process: the person who owns a
Cadillac (or Lexus or Bentley) has more prestige than the people working
on the assembly-line that produced it. But commodity fetishism refers to
more - the belief that the car (or any manufactured object) is more
important than people, and confers special powers (i.e., beyond the
power to travel sixty miles in an hour, or flatten hedgehogs) to those
who possess it.

In general, commodity fetishism tends to replace inter-human
relationships with relationships between humans and objects: for
example, the relationship between producer and consumer is obscured. The
producer can only see his relationship with the object he produces,
being unaware of the people who will ultimately use that object.
Similarly, the consumer can only see his relationship with the object he
uses, being unaware of the people who produced that object. Thus,
commodity fetishism ensures that neither side is fully conscious of the
political and social positions they occupy. The object of Marxist
critique is to reveal the social relations that are hidden behind
relations among objects ... and to reveal the creativity of the worker
hidden behind the objectification of human beings.


[edit] After Marx
The fetishism of commodities has proven fertile material for work by
other theorists since Marx, who have added to, adapted, or, perhaps,
"vulgarized" the original concept. Sigmund Freud's well-known but
unrelated theory of sexual fetishism led to new interpretations of
commodity fetishism, as types of sexually charged relationships between
a person and a manufactured object.

György Lukács based History and Class Consciousness on Marx's notion,
developing his own notion of commodity reification as the key obstacle
to class consciousness. Lukács's work was a significant influence on
later philosophers such as Guy Debord and Jean Baudrillard. Debord
developed a notion of the spectacle that ran directly parallel to Marx's
notion of the commodity; for Debord, the spectacle made relations among
people seem like relations among images (and vice versa). The spectacle
is the form taken by society once the instruments of cultural production
have become wholly commoditised and exposed to circulation. Debord's
work should be seen as a confirmation of the existence of what Marx's
critique would seem to predict as, within it, the intimacies of
intersubjective and personal self-relating are critiqued as already
being affected by commodification. In the work of the semiotician
Baudrillard, commodity fetishism is deployed to explain subjective
feelings towards consumer goods in the "realm of circulation", that is,
among consumers. Baudrillard was especially interested in the cultural
mystique added to objects by advertising, which encourages consumers to
purchase them as aids to the construction of their personal identity. In
For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, Baudrillard
develops a notion of the sign that, like Debord's notion of spectacle,
runs alongside Marx's commodity.

Other theorists have been concerned with the social status of the
producers of consumer items relative to their consumers. For example,
the person who owns a Porsche has more prestige than the people working
on the assembly-line that produced it. But this version of commodity
fetishism refers to more-the belief that the car (or any manufactured
object) is more important than people, and confers special powers beyond
material utility to those who possess it (see also Conspicuous
consumption).


[edit] See also
Commodity (Marxism) 
Jean Baudrillard, a theorist whose System of Objects borrows from Marx

False consciousness 
Guy Debord 
Debord's The Society of the Spectacle (full text) 
Georg Lukacs's theory of Class consciousness and false consciousness
and his concept of reification 
Marxism 
relations of production 
Ideology 
Diamond 
Gold 
Change the World Without Taking Power 

[edit] References
Debord, Guy (1983) The Society of the Spectacle, ????: Black and Red. 
Lukács, Georg (1972) History and Class Consciousness, Cambridge: MIT
Press. 
Marx, Karl (1992) Capital: Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy,
London: Penguin. 




This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
www.surfcontrol.com

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to