In a message dated 1/6/2009 12:00:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, jann...@gmail.com writes: > 9. Super Capitalism, Super Imperialism and Monetary Imperialism > (Charles Brown)
>>CB: Most of Lenin's concepts from 1916 don't need updating. Monopoly, financial oligarchy cartels. financial sector dominance and parasitism of industrial capital, objective laws or tendencies of capitalism apply better in 2009 than anything you or other analysts are talking about. We can learn more from the dead Lenin about capitalism 2009 than we can from your posts even though you are alive (ha ha !). As to the updating, aren't you up to that ?<< Poor CB,he can't even tell when I agree with him. Dude, if you would stop soaking your ass in places like A-hole list, Marxmal and Liberal Bored Observer, maybe we could communicate occasionally. CJ Comment An industrial capital formation as a historically distinct sector of capital no longer exist. I am not aware of one single economist of note that speaks of an industrial sector of capital. Not one. The existence of Chrysler, Ford or GM does not mean a sector of capital called industrial capital exists. Industrial capital without industrial capitalists cannot exists. Where is the industrial capitalist as a sector of capital? Why not simple produce the evidence of the existence of a sector of capital that is industrial capital? Waistline **************New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026) _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
