Communists do not have separate demands from various   
segment of the working class. IN fact it is these real world demands  that  
creates 
the line of march. Here is how Marx and Engels defined  the task and role  of 
communists. 
 
^^^
CB: So, stop talking about a communist polarity
 
 
Comment
 
Do you support the American invasion of Afghanistan? Do you support the  
demand of the antiwar movement to remove US troops from Afghanistan?
 
To speak of unemployment and the fight against it as the cornerstone of the  
communist polarity and will always be talked about on a Marxist list serv. On  
the other hand I deeply respect those who are not communist and the  
non-communists have just as much of a right to put forth their views. I believe 
 the 
dividing line on a Marxist List serv is between communism and  anti-communism. 
 
The communist polarity in American society is objective. It is not a  
subjective disposition or ideology. Those sectors of the working class more 
than  
less shut out of the civic society of the bourgeoisie are an objective 
communist  
formation, because their spontaneous demands are for socially necessary means 
of  life. In a word welfare. The fight for welfare is the communist polarity 
in  American society with a huge section of the working class slowly warming 
to the  idea that government must provide for the people when the free market 
capitalist  fails and it is failing big time. That is the communist polarity 
and it is going  to be talked about on a Marxist List serv. Communism is not to 
be understood as  an ideology but rather the historic movement of people - 
real human beings, that  emerged with the emergence of classes as a property 
expression, in human  history. As long as communism is understood as some kind 
of 
conspiracy on the  part of individuals  . . . the bourgeois point of view, the 
deepening  revolution in the mode of production makes no sense. 
 
We have entered an era of revolution. 
 
*************
 
CB: Correct. Don't raise aboltion of private property now. That's the  
ultimate goal,not the current line of march
 
Comment
 
"Don't raise abolition of private property now?"  I have absolutely no  idea 
what you are talking about. Abolition of private property is not a demand,  
reform or a concession to be sought from the bourgeoisie. . 
 
The line of march, in my opinion. is as I have described it for the  past 10 
years. The demands of the poorest workers is the line . . . as these  demands 
intersect with various layers of the working class. 
 
Now, discussion of all of Marx projection and thinking is appropriate for a  
Marxist List serv. 
 
There is of course a deeper issue and that is the communist approach to  work 
in the legislative and electoral arena. I have some direct experience in  
this arena, as well as negotiation with the representatives of institutional  
capital. Communist most certainly must volunteer or be assigned to this arena 
of  
struggle. Most of our communist work is however non-electoral. 
 
 
***************
 
CB; Sure but, we aren't there yet. The agenda of what is doable now is  being 
set by O. 
 
And by the way, over the last 30 years, the other "team" has built up a 49  
to 0 lead. So, we have to make a lot of touchdowns. You can't score 7 
touchdowns  on one play.
 
 
Comment
 
Interesting analogy.
 
We are to understand that the extension of unemployment benefit is not a  
concession but a touchdown.
 
Brother, not very long ago you were cheerleading for communist to support  
the bank bailout plan and schemes to nationalize the banks, only to back off  
this position. No matter how hard communists on various list screamed against  
the idea of nationalizing the banks you refused to listen. Apparently, in a  
moment of spiritual awakening to decided that maybe nationalizing banks is not 
a 
 bright idea, given the fact that there is no mathematical way to value 
assets or  even determine a rational model to stabilize the Ponzi schemes of 
the  
bourgeoisie. Further, when asked how will this help the working class, no one  
could answer the question. 
 
What is wrong is a misunderstanding of capitalism, this moment of deepening  
crisis and the meaning of concessions; and fights in the legislative and  
electoral arena. Simply defining what is taking place in the legislative arena  
as 
the legislative arena, allows communists and Marxist to understand there is a 
 larger field of social struggle. 
 
There is a profound misunderstanding of the legislative and electoral  arena. 
  First of all Obama does not set the agenda for what is  doable. Here does 
not even set the agenda. Even the most backwards trade union  leader knows that 
real life sets and creates the need for an agenda. What sets  the framework 
for what is doable is a complex intersection of class needs or  identity of 
interest. 
 
The needs of capital and the workers connected to capital as the social  
process, are expressed in the political sphere as the agenda that various  
sectarian factions within the ruling class address. What is doable arises as a  
social response to economic and social strife expressing the widening breach  
between the productive forces and the social relations of production as the  
latter 
is destabilized by the former. Maintaining the unity between the latter  and 
the former dictates what is on the agenda as short term and long term goals  
for the ruling class. 
 
I am not bragging to state that early, the day after Obama was elected I  
wrote extensively on matters of unemployment, health care, housing and other  
needs of the working class - all layers, and what specific points are doable  
based on class intersection. The archives of this list and Pen-L: will prove  
this. 
 
The point is that the working class has not scored a touchdown at all. In  
fact the working class is being pushed back. One year form now we shall see why 
 
we have to redouble are efforts in and most certainly outside the legislative 
 arena just to stand still. 
 
Your logic is tragic. 
 
 
WL. 
**************Need a job? Find employment help in your area. 
(http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agencies&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000005)

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to