In a message dated 12/30/2009 10:46:05 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
CB: Not a very convincing argument that to make such a New Deal was ridiculous. Comment Actually, I was not trying to convince anyone of anything. Opinion various on the Senate bill. Some support it and some do not. By support I mean active campaigning amongst various health care groups and unions in favor of the bill. By not supporting the bill is meant the group I am involved with - "Retirees for Single Payer Health Care," will not be calling our legislators advocating support for the Senate Bill, or distributing literature amongst UAW members in support of the Senate bill but will continue to push for a Single Payer system as outlined in the UAW Constitutional Convention resolutions. In fact we are pushing for the union to do more in winning our own union members over to the UAW resolution on health care, as we prepare for the upcoming Convention to be held in Detroit next year. "Retirees for Single Payer Health Care," meets on Monday's at 1 p.m. at UAW Local 22, located at 4300 Michigan Ave. Next meeting on Jan. 4, 2010. There are other issues being tackled like the impact of VEBA, which takes root Jan 1, 2010. My reply to this "interesting article by a Detroit autoworker," was basically castigating the idea that support for a bill is akin to governing a country, and the idea that organizing protest is easy. WL. _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list [email protected] To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
