Thanks, but I am not sure what this means for a description of class
antagonism and its emergence within the feudal system.

^^^^^
CB; You mentioned kings and queens in your analysis of class
antagonism and its emergence within the feudal system. So, whatever
your mention of them meant for a description of class antagonism ,
etc, would be impacted by this.  Basically, I guess, the institution
of the monarchy was more "in between"  the bourgeois side and  the
feudal side of the antagonism

 More over for two groups
of people who have zero understanding of the Marxist approach.

^^^^^
CB: Many people who have zero understanting of the Marxist approach do
have some idea of "kings and queens".  So, this European historical
institution might be a hook for them to get some understanding.

^^^^^

 Will gladly
send  you the entire draft by the end of the month. Actually, the draft can
be sent  today, but the problem is that all the words and terms have not been
completed.  Further, work takes place on this project everyday with
meetings three times a  week, squeezed between classes. A draft sent
today would be
different from the  draft being prepared for Monday.

^^^^
CB: OK.  Thanks

Then there is a total of four sections to the glossary. Section one is word
 and term definitions with narrative. In section one for instance there are
four  different indexes for the word class. Class, class strata, class as
the shape of  property and class as a concrete form of labor in different
historical eras.  Interestingly, the words Trotskyism and Stalinism are not in
the text.  Nor  is there a critique or criticism of the CPUSA or any other
group for that  matter.

More interesting is Section one beings with the American Revolutionary War.
 Yep.

Section Two summarizes all the communist international organizations from
the First to th Fourth.

Section 3 is Expositions deploying many of the terms in section one

Section 4 is literally Marxist catch phrases. Sutff like the philosophers
have only interpreted the world in so many ways, the point if to change it.

At this writing there is 40 individual pages 4 and 1/4 by 5 and 1/2 or  an
6 by eleven sheet folded. We top out at 50.

The problem is the rapid transitions in the writings and construction.

WL.

^^^^^
CB: This is a suggestion that if you mention monarchy in the writings,
you might want to say it's not a feudal institution, but a
transitional institution between feudalism and capitalism.  This might
be enlightening (smile) for many , as many people think of kings and
queens as a main part of feudalism, when they are transitional  Also,
you might want to mention that the nation arises with the bourgeoisie.

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to