======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


So now it's OK to discuss the causes of the collapse of the USSR, as
opposed to when I posted last year on the alienation of Soviet workers
towards the regime from the 20s to the 80s. 
Soviet workers never seemed to get the orders coming from Stalin and
Beria, then later Khrutschev and Brejnev, being accused of
"bezideinost" (lack of political comitment) because they were always
bitching about price increases and absolutely hated the "peredovki" that
were supposed to create emulation by their hard, unyielding comitment to
ever increasing productivity figures. Members of the "peredovki" (1920s
through 1960s), "excellent work battalions", were beaten up in remote
localities, as they pushed up production quotas. While it took and
ordinary worker 60 minutes to install the upholstery in a Soviet car, a
"peredovki"/"novatory" would do it in 35minutes flat, and thus force all
the other workers to "follow in their glorious footsteps towards
socialsim". A favourite means of revenge was to switch the pneumatic
airpressure for the drill/pneumatic screwdriver with the oil hose, thus
resulting in a large explosion of oil all over the upholstery. Peredovki
were also given the wrong bolts, or bolts covered with sand, resulting
in bolted pieces spectacularly falling off at the end of the assembly
line. In fact, it now appears that Stalin was right :  a great amount of
sabotage was being inflicted on the Soviet economy by workers who had
decided to be "indifferent" and "work-shy" in the face of an
unprecedented militarization of the workforce (workers forced to work on
Sundays, interior passports being issued to prevent workers from
changing city/region, compulsory haranging by the nomenklatura,
reduction in purchasing power comlpared to the Khlokozien market,
increased surveillance of the workplace, etc.) 
Of course, one had to be careful in order not to land in I.T.L (gulag)
"Reeducation through Work Institution", where hundreds of thousands were
worked to death on the mines of the Kola penisnsula, Northern Dvina, or
especialy Norislk on the Yenisei. (17%/year mortality rate).
To call this "resistance" to Stalinism would be misleading. Workers were
just fed up with the ever changing rules (after each plan, the 4th plan,
just after WWII was grudgingly accepted, but the 7th was really felt as
annoying). Under Khroutshcev, workers got their hopes up again, and the
Soviet economy started to produce more consummer goods. But it quickly
turned out to be a farce. The local Soviets were re-organized in larger
"regional units", more changes were introduced in middle-management
(through technical training), and workers became increasingly under the
direct control of foremen whose pay was linked to "productivity
increases".
In the case or rural workers, who comprised half of the Soviet
workforce, they were reagraded as "apolitichnost" because they
stubbornly retained their 0.5 ha private garden and continued to sell to
Kholkhozien markets. And were ever trying to encroach upon the Kholkhoze
lands to agrandize their private gardens. The situation was exactly the
same as in feudal Europe, where peasents had to work the "ager" (crop
fields) for the lord, but were always trying to use the commons
(marshland, meadows, briar patches, woods, roadsides, etc) to graze
their own cattle. And of course use the "hortus" (small private garden
next to the house) to grow an incredibly productive and well-manured
variety of vegetables that they would sell in the towns (raisins-wine,
courgettes, pumpkins, beans, strawberries, ...).




________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to