======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Brian Becker wrote (and Eli posted)

>Shame on those U.S. liberal groups and 'progressives' who consider 
>the prospect of U.S. and NATO intervention to be a secondary 
factor 
>in this unfolding struggle.

I think I get this argument but I ask comrades here to help me to
make it sure I've got it right. The proper position, the only 
principled 
position, on the situation in Libya is to focus exclusively
on the threat of US intervention. Attacking the oppressive,
corrupt, and imperialist enabling nature of the Libyan regime
has the practical effect of actually supporting imperialism by not 
properly exposing the global class nature of the conflict.
This is more than just a tactic in this particular case, but 
part of an over all strategy for fighting for revolution in 
the US as described in an article by PSL supporting the 
Iranian regime:

>The anti-imperialist path of struggle, the only path that 
>leads to socialism, never finds excuses to side with our 
>“own” bourgeoisie against its enemies. Rather, it stands 
>with the targets of the empire. 


From,‘Growing U.S. War Threats Against Iran Challenge 
For Anti-War Movement’ March 1, 2006.

The target of the empire right now is the Libyan
regime which should therefore must supported as 
a means of mobilizing the American people against
our own bourgeoisie. As regards the people of
Libya, they may indeed be suffering under the 
regime but they do not have the right to revolution
(as in Iran). Such a revolutionary movement, 
confronting a regime to which the US has been 
hostile, inexorably becomes a tool of imperialism.

Is this correct? Is it close? Am I right in assuming that 
the theoretical basis of  this analysis derives from an 
article in an SWP Internal Bulletin (Vol.XV, No. 15, May 1953, ) 
entitled 'The Global Class War and the Destiny of American 
Labor'? Where I can get as copy of this important 
document which I am assuming is at the heart of
decades of  impressive organizing work by the
Workers World Party, International Action Center,
ANSWER, Party of Liberation and Socialism, etc.?

If anybody does has a copy of that document 
(or knows where I can find one in print or online),
I would greatly appreciate the information. 




________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to