======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


On 01.05.2011 23:09, Mark Lause wrote:

I am not entirely pleased with how the list is moderated, but I can't figure
out how it could be done better...and neither has anyone else.

Certainly, I would be far more shocked if we had a list of 1300 Marxists
successfully moderated by a committee of 130.  On what basis would Louis
"entrust moderation" to such a body?  Would it be appointed?  Annointed in
Westminster?  How would that be any better?

And, we could have an election, of course, but there's no basis for making
any but the most superficial choices among the 1300 possible members of this
committee?  We could post pictures and vote based on haircuts, I suppose....


Perhaps we could make sure that we have constituencies represented...the 70
members of the Jura Federation...the 200 ex-Maoists...450 former
Trotskyists... the 150 representatives of the interested intelligence
organizations of the various nations and institutions...

1. SPELL OUT A SANE SOLUTION and,

2. if it's not implemented here, START A LIST BASED ON THAT SOLUTION....

But, for the sake of honesty, people should stop pretending that this is
more than an email list.  Nothing here prevents anyone on the list from
saying or writing anything they please.

Seconded! Couldn't have said it better myself.

Einde O'Callaghan

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to