======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


 

On 5/6/11 8:04 PM, Fred Feldman wrote:>

Let me point out that the Swedish government protested Venezuela's action
in sending the journalist since he was in fact a Swedish citizen. This can
have a progressive impact, regardless of the stand of the Chavez government
, which I understand, just as I understand Lenin's decision to turn the
whole Ukraine and more (imagine how many good people suffered as a
consequence)..



Louis commented:
Lenin's decision to turn the whole Ukraine?

This is incoherent babble. It is really depressing to see former leaders of
the SWP like Fred writing things that make no sense. I might have taken the
trouble to answer him if I understood what the hell he was trying to say. 

I get that he is trying to defend the Cuban revolution or something like
that but Cuba surely needs its advocates to use a grammar checker. Or at
least review their foggy prose before unleashing it on a mailing list of
1300 people trying to make sense of the class struggle. 



Fred replies::

I appreciate Louis's pointing out of my grammatically and otherwise garbled
paragraph. Thiis, as anyone who has followed the list over he years, is a
long-standing tendency related to rushing and the fact that I am better at
patiently editing others than at editing myself (not as rare a disability as
the completely infallible Louis may think). At any rate, I congratulate our
owner and moderator for giving all and any who might fail to express
themselves clearly and grammatically in every paragraph of anything they
write, especially if they disagree with  the owner-moderator and
genius-in-residence, clear warning that they should steer clear of  the
Marxism List,.

 

At any rate, here is the ccriminally jumbled paragraph . whuch apparently
proves  (at  least in the land where Proyect iis the wonderful wizard,) that
my views on any question are not worth any consideration, -as I might have
written it if I had my act together:

 

Let me point out that the Swedish government protested Venezuela's action
in sending the journalist  to Colombia, since he was in fact a Swedish
citizen. This can
have a progressive impact, regardless of the stand of the Chavez government
, which I understand, just as I understand Lenin's decision to turn the
whole Ukraine and more over to Germany  in the Brest-Litovsk agreement
(imagine how many good people suffered as a
consequence)..



Louis'  insistence that this paragraph had something to do with  the Cuban
revolution is just routine Castro baiting, just as other parts of his
response are equally routine US-SWP baiting. Even in the gibberish form I
initially submitted, there was no indication that I was discussing  Cuba
rather than the concession that Venezuela had made on the matter (and Louis
is way smart enough to know that even from the initial gibberish form.. But
Louis tries to avoid debating me by passing me off as a Castro hand-puppet.
In fact Louis never tries to actually take up the ideas anyone - and I do
mean anyone, not just me - who disagrees seriously with him.

 

He sneers, he smears, he baits, he misrepresents what others say , he seizes
on grammatical mistakes  and breakdowns in thought and typing - and other
than that he simply has nothing to say. That's not because he is stupid . I
am ready to sign a notarized declaration here and now that Louis is smarter
than I am. I have no idea why he is so bizarrely (for one of his capacities)
incapable of  debating his positions civilly with someone who disagrees. 

 

For instance, why did he select only that paragraph to challenge?  What
about all the other paragraphs that expressed ideas he probably deeply
disagrees with, the stuff that Dennis and Manuel challenged and also other
matters that they did not take up.. He has nothing to say about the politics
of what I  wrote - only the illiteracy of one paragraph, a completely
nonpolitical issue.

 

Why? Despite being raised by a psychoanalyst (which I have come to think may
have been a disadvantage), I increasingly have come to realize that I am a
dumb-bell who has no clue what realy makes our owner, moderator, and
genius-in-residence tick.

Fred Feldman

 

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to