======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


As I sometimes note, my primary vocation has always been that of a grassroots 
social justice organizer.  Although I've taught in very solid colleges and 
universities, almost always organizing concurrently, I've never been based in 
the ostensibly prestigious academic entities on the East and West coasts. I am 
not a "conference organizer" -- trotting ostentatiously and pompously from one 
such affair to another. Although I appreciate some sound theory, I'm certainly 
not a dry theoretician.  But, in conjunction with grassroots people from a  
wide variety of backgrounds -- racial, ethnic, tribal, age, rural and small 
town and urban -- all over this country, I can point to a very successful track 
record over very stormy decades.

I wrote the attached piece almost four years ago.  At that time, some people 
were tossing around the term, "community organizer" with little comprehension 
about what real organizing entails. And some of that superficiality continues.  
Nowadays, what can be termed "mobilization" (frequently via internet) is often 
seen as community organization.  But mobilization, by itself and however 
dramatic it may briefly be, is very far from full and bona fide grassroots 
organizing.  Mobilization can be an important flare-up part of an already 
on-going and enduring oak wood organizing burn for special strategic and 
tactical purposes.  And, with hard and fastly initiated follow-up organizing 
work, simple mobilization can lead to on-going and enduring community 
organization.  But mobilization, by itself, simply burns itself out -- like 
fast burning pitchy pine.  Bona fide social justice grassroots organizing, 
depthy and pervasive and, by its inherent nature, sensibly radical and 
visionary, is about the hardest -- and ultimately the most satisfying -- work 
of which I know on Earth. (H)

THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZER -- AS PRACTITIONER, TEACHER, WRITER AND STUDENT [HUNTER 
GRAY/HUNTER BEAR [FEBRUARY 19 2008] -- LINK TO MY FULL MINI-COURSE FOLLOWS 
IMMEDIATELY. 


I think that Community Organizing can only be effectively done and conveyed, to 
/ with grassroots people or formal students, if the organizer is a genuinely 
experienced -- experienced -- individual.

Virtually anyone can call himself / herself a "community organizer."  There are 
not, in this particular field, any formal certification requirements or issued 
licenses.  And it also takes a Real One [of which there are fortunately many] 
to effectively teach and write about it.

To me, a bona fide community organizer is someone who is actively and 
effectively involved over a substantial period of time in the hard, tedious, 
and sometimes genuinely dangerous work of getting people together and keeping 
people together -- for meaningful action.  And, as I certainly see it, of 
course, this has to be within the context of the pursuit of social justice.

This has to involve much more than, simply, a few here-and-there, hit-and-miss 
local endeavors -- or limited "support" activities from a safe and cloistered 
setting.  It has to involve vastly more than simply being a participant in, 
say, a march.

I'm talking about someone who plays a signal role in initiating  constructive 
fires [figuratively] and who, systematically, works to carry that through to 
relative success as yet another stretch of the trail in the Save the World 
Business.  Sometimes it's a pitchy-pine hot and flaring fire; more likely it's 
the long oak wood burn with an occasional flare.

An organizer can be an altruistic someone who starts as a neophyte and who 
works with an experienced organizer -- and it can also be someone who arises 
spontaneously in a social justice crisis and feathers out with dispatch.  In 
both instances, the organizer "learns by doing" and keeps going.

And a genuinely good and effective organizer never stops learning from the 
grassroots people with whom he / she works.

Without wasting time on false modesty, I've sometimes referred to an 
"organizing credential" of mine as my graduate degree in militant organizing. 
Awarded me in 1963 in the heat of our massive Jackson [Mississippi] Movement 
was a sheaf of papers with myself  as the lead name:  City of Jackson vs. John 
R. Salter, Jr et al. Prepared by Mississippi's top anti-civil rights lawyer 
[Thomas Watkins] who consulted with a bevy of others including the then state 
AG, it's considered the most sweeping anti-civil rights "order" issued during 
the general period.  It sought to prohibit us from engaging in any kind of 
demonstration and boycott, "conspiring" to do such, and doing anything to 
"consummate conspiracies" to demonstrate and boycott.  And, to forestall any 
legal complications from the state's perspective, it set the first hearing date 
90 days hence.  It was copied by other jurisdictions in the South. The bevy of 
heavily armed wide-brim hatted Mississippi deputy sheriffs who coldly and 
formally delivered my copy obviously viewed it as pure Holy Writ. For our part, 
we simply defied it and kept going. [It's on our website, not hard to find. -- 
along with a great many accounts and details of my own personal organizing 
projects.]

But my greatest satisfactions are always based on the positive appraisals of 
those on whose behalf I'm involved -- in actual social justice campaigns.  
Those are priceless.

Academia?  Taking a class or two?  That can offer some valuable approaches and 
insights -- but only if the teacher is an organizer with substantial experience 
who can talk in solid fashion, not only about the work of others but, 
primarily, what he / she has actually done.  Organizing is a living art, not 
simply an erector-set craft and, if it's taught as art, the recipient -- formal 
student or grassroots person -- will learn some very solid things.

There was a time, briefly, at the end of the 1960s, when several schools of 
social work issued MSW degrees with a specialization in community organizing.  
Apparently that proved too difficult for the schools which shifted, fairly 
quickly, into social policy [ mostly agency administration.]  In our organizing 
work on the South/Southwest side of Chicago, we were fortunate in hiring and 
retaining two MSW persons, each of whom had their degree with a formal and 
specific organizing focus -- via University of Michigan and University of 
Illinois [Circle.]  They did, as was the case of our entire staff of two dozen 
or so, very fine work. But they readily conceded that they were learning far 
more in the field than they ever had in classrooms.

For my part, I have taught community organizing [while continuing my own 
organizing on the side] in every one of the far-flung colleges and universities 
at which I've sojourned.  While on some occasions, it's been an added dimension 
to a course formally on another topic, it's also been, in the main, as its very 
own course.  These have carried both undergraduate and graduate credit 
depending on the specific student.   And, of course, I've also taught it, as a 
working organizer, to grassroots people and other organizers as well -- in all 
sorts of workshops and conferences.

And, wherever I've taught community organizing, academic or grassroots or 
whatever, every single person -- bar none -- has wanted a practical, down to 
earth approach with as many personally experiential case histories of campaigns 
that I can provide. I cannot emphasize this strongly enough.  [This also 
includes the personal histories of various protagonists.]  And I do have a 
great many of these personal accounts -- and there are others who do as well.  
At this juncture, I have several rich decades of them.

But faithfully remember: a really first-rate organizer / teacher always -- 
always -- learns much from his / her grassroots colleagues and classroom 
students.

And, although I have my own somewhat eclectic Vision and am not oblivious to 
theory [I got along nicely and profitably in Sociological Theory], I've never 
found theory by itself -- and certainly not heavy ideology -- to be especially 
interesting to those to and with whom I talk. That poses no problem for me.  
The genuinely radical Southern poet, the late John Beecher, an old friend over 
many decades, commented approvingly and publicly of me that "he wears no man's 
collar."

Whenever or wherever I've taught community organizing, I've always used many of 
my personal case histories.  If particular occasion permits, I lace these with 
much use of primary documents -- everything from field reports to leaflets, 
media clippings, legal briefs, much more.  We do a heavy focus on tactics and 
strategies, building democracy, ethical questions. [In formal courses, I've 
often given a key issue and its setting as an essay test question.]

Field practicums aren't offered vis-a-vis a single class.  But, for especially 
interested students, I early on did separate, follow-up Independent Studies -- 
de facto practicums, complete with appropriate field placements [and for full 
academic credit, of course.]

I avoid overly detailed, tight syllabi.  And I consistently encourage a hell of 
a lot of discussion.  Many people have had, in their own right, grassroots 
organizing experiences of one kind or another.  Workshops [and conferences] 
always have people who are actually doing good things in the field.

And all of that is super-enriching.

Certain films can be extremely helpful -- e.g., Salt of the Earth, Norma Rae, 
Shane. And there are many others.

And music, too: well-done civil rights songs; and labor and related stuff from, 
among others, Pete Seeger and Joe Glazer.

Outside speakers?  Certainly an occasional one, very preferably another 
organizer / grassroots activist -- directly from, as the old Wobblies used to 
put it, "the point of production."

Written scholarly or quasi-scholarly works on community organizing?  Be careful 
-- very careful.  Most of that, at best, has only very limited use. Usually dry 
and lifeless, this stuff is almost always written or compiled by ivory-towered 
academics using comparable works by comparable others and offers very little in 
the way of technique and insight.  I place high priority on the accounts of 
folks who have actually Organized. [This can include people such as the late 
Saul Alinsky with whose "top down" organizing strategy, I -- with my 
grassroots-up focus -- strongly disagree. I've used Alinsky's Rules for 
Radicals on several occasions as a support text.]  Occasionally, I've used my 
own very detailed book -- Jackson, Mississippi: An American Chronicle of 
Struggle and Schism, 1979 and 1987].   (Now reissued, late 2011 -- with a new 
and very substantial Introduction by myself -- via University of Nebraska 
Press.)

http://hunterbear.org/my_combined_community_organizing.htm
In Solidarity,  Hunter Bear

HUNTER GRAY [HUNTER BEAR/JOHN R SALTER JR] Mi'kmaq /St. Francis 
Abenaki/St. Regis Mohawk 
Protected by Na´shdo´i´ba´i´ 
and Ohkwari' 
www.hunterbear.org 
(much social justice material)
 
For the new, just out (11/2011) and expanded/updated
edition of my "Organizer's Book," JACKSON MISSISSIPPI -- 
with a new and substantial Introduction by me:
http://hunterbear.org/jackson.htm
 
Our community organizing course:
http://hunterbear.org/my_combined_community_organizing.htm
 
Personal Background Narrative (with many links):
http://hunterbear.org/narrative.htm

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to