====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
I haven't had time yet to read the whole essay by critiqueofcrisistheory, but I skipped to the end for the conclusion -- where he claims that Baran et al. believed the working class in imperialist countries were hopelessly bought off and that's why the MR crew were Maoists. Is that an accurate assessment in general of their beliefs? Does the newly-unearthed document have anything specific to say about that? And more importantly, does the continuation of their legacy in John Bellamy Foster's economics writing maintain this position? On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Mike Treen <m...@unite.org.nz> wrote: > ============================================================ > In its July-August 2012 issue, Monthly Review has published a new document > entitled “Some Theoretical Implications,” written by Paul Baran, which was > originally intended to be a chapter of “Monopoly Capital.”... > ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
