====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
On 04/17/2013 06:47 PM, michael a. lebowitz wrote: > "In one voting center in Yaracuy, Maduro got 1000 percent more votes > than Chavez did. How can anyone believe that?" he said. > > However, the results from last year's election show that the three > voting centers that Capriles gave as examples were cases in which all > the votes from that center had not yet been registered in 2012's > results when the election was called for Chavez, leading to an > extremely low vote count from those centers for both candidates. > > In the Yaracuy voting center, for example, a total of only 9 votes > out of 75 were registered in 2012's elections, 7 for Hugo Chavez and > 2 votes for Henrique Capriles. > > However, on Sunday all the votes from this center were registered > before the election was called, leading to 73 votes for Nicolas > Maduro, and only 6 votes for Henrique Capriles. I don't quite get this explanation, can someone clarify (it's probably a language issue, I'm not a native speaker)? What does it mean that "all the votes from that center had not yet been registered in 2012's results when the election was called for Chavez"..? Thanks! Link: http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/8665 -- jjonas @ nic.fi ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
