======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Dear Clay Clairborne,

I don't know you, so forgive this intrusion.

I saw on the Marxmail list that you had posted an essay called "More 
Opportunist Lies on Syria from Counterpunch."

In that article you write, "Counterpunch has time and again shown that it has 
no integrity when it comes to reporting on people's revolts against its 
'anti-imperialist' heroes like the fascist dictatorships like Mummar Qaddafi 
and Bashar Assad."

I have written for Counterpunch from the 1990s. Since the move to the web, I 
have regularly written for the website. During the Arab Spring, I have been on 
of the stable of people who have written for Counterpunch, mainly regarding the 
struggles in Libya.

By making the kind of sweeping generalization that you make, you erase the 
writing that people like myself do on the Counterpunch website. It would be 
inconceivable to portray the work I have done as treating either Qaddafi or 
Assad as anti-imperialist heroes. In fact, my work runs on a much different 
track than what you denounce. Are you suggesting that the writing that I, and 
others, do on Counterpunch does not define its work "time and again"?

Jeffrey is better equipped to say this, but I will give you my impression: 
Counterpunch is an anti-systemic website with a wide range of writers, many of 
whom would not agree with each other (one of the regulars is Lou himself). 
There is no strict editorial line, as far as I can tell, and that is for the 
better. The editors obviously have a view, which is a good thing, but they do 
not publish only what is strictly in accordance either with their views or with 
that of their other writers.

I was one of the first to sign the petition that Bricmont attacks. I think his 
comment on the statement was very poorly done. But that's his mess.

You are of course entitled to draw broad strokes denunciations of whom you 
wish. To be more credible, however, you (and Bricmont) would be better suited 
to a bit more nuance and accuracy.

Best Wishes,

Vijay.

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to