======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================
(This is written by the NY Times reporter I spoke to a couple of weeks ago.)
NY Times September 22, 2013
A Mayoral Hopeful Now, de Blasio Was Once a Young Leftist
By JAVIER C. HERNÁNDEZ
The scruffy young man who arrived in Nicaragua in 1988 stood out.
He was tall and sometimes goofy, known for his ability to mimic a
goose’s honk. He spoke in long, meandering paragraphs, musing on
Franklin D. Roosevelt, Karl Marx and Bob Marley. He took painstaking
notes on encounters with farmers, doctors and revolutionary fighters.
Bill de Blasio, then 26, went to Nicaragua to help distribute food and
medicine in the middle of a war between left and right. But he returned
with something else entirely: a vision of the possibilities of an
unfettered leftist government.
As he seeks to become the next mayor of New York City, Mr. de Blasio,
the city’s public advocate, has spoken only occasionally about his time
as a fresh-faced idealist who opposed foreign wars, missile defense
systems and apartheid in the late 1980s and early 1990s. References to
his early activism have been omitted from his campaign Web site.
But a review of hundreds of pages of records and more than two dozen
interviews suggest his time as a young activist was more influential in
shaping his ideology than previously known, and far more political than
typical humanitarian work.
Mr. de Blasio, who studied Latin American politics at Columbia and was
conversational in Spanish, grew to be an admirer of Nicaragua’s ruling
Sandinista party, thrusting himself into one of the most polarizing
issues in American politics at the time. The Reagan administration
denounced the Sandinistas as tyrannical and Communist, while their
liberal backers argued that after years of dictatorship, they were
building a free society with broad access to education, land and health
care.
Today, Mr. de Blasio is critical of the Sandinistas’ crackdown on
dissenters, but said he learned from his time trying to help the Central
American country.
“My work was based on trying to create a more fair and inclusive world,”
he said in a recent interview. “I have an activist’s desire to improve
people’s lives.”
Mr. de Blasio became an ardent supporter of the Nicaraguan
revolutionaries. He helped raise funds for the Sandinistas in New York
and subscribed to the party’s newspaper, Barricada, or Barricade. When
he was asked at a meeting in 1990 about his goals for society, he said
he was an advocate of “democratic socialism.”
Now, Mr. de Blasio, a Democrat, describes himself as a progressive. He
has campaigned for mayor as a liberal firebrand who would set out to
reduce inequality in the city by offering more help to poor families and
asking wealthy residents to pay more in taxes. He said that seeing the
efforts of the Sandinistas up close strengthened his view that
government should protect and enhance the lives of the poor.
“It was very affecting for me,” Mr. de Blasio said of his work with
Nicaraguans, in a recent interview. “They were in their own humble way,
in this small country, trying to figure out what would work better.”
An Epiphany Abroad
The roots of Mr. de Blasio’s progressive brand of politics lie in the
shadows of volcanoes, thousands of miles from the city he now hopes to
lead, at a decaying health clinic in Masaya, a small Nicaraguan city.
Mr. de Blasio, bearded, gawky and cerebral, had arrived in the city as
part of a 10-day tour of Nicaragua in 1988, the capstone of the year he
spent as an employee of the Quixote Center, a social justice group in
Maryland.
The center, founded by Catholic leaders, officially did not take sides
in the Nicaraguan dispute, though much of its aid went to help families
sympathetic to the Sandinistas. And its work was intensely political.
One of the center’s leaders once likened American efforts in Nicaragua
to a “policy of terrorism,” and its harshest critics accused it of
hewing to a Marxist agenda. In the mid-1980s, the Treasury Department
investigated whether the center had helped smuggle guns, but the claim
was never substantiated, and the group’s leaders said the inquiry was
politically motivated.
At the time, gunshots and protest songs permeated the Nicaraguan air as
the Sandinistas waged war with the contras, a counterrevolutionary
movement backed by the United States. The Sandinista slogan declared,
“Free homeland or death!”
American leaders feared that the Sandinistas, who received weapons from
the Soviet Union and supplies from Cuba, would set off a socialist
movement across Latin America. But the United States’ decision to
intervene in Nicaragua was unpopular, especially after it was revealed
that the Reagan administration had covertly financed the contra
rebellion, even after Congress had voted to cut off assistance to the
fighters.
The involvement of the United States galvanized activists across the
country who saw parallels to Vietnam. Tens of thousands of Americans —
medical workers, religious volunteers, antiwar activists — flocked to
Nicaragua hoping to offset the effects of an economic embargo imposed by
the United States. Many were drawn to the idea of creating a new, more
egalitarian society. Critics, however, said they were gullible and had
romanticized their mission — more interested in undermining the efforts
of the Reagan administration than helping the poor.
At the health clinic in Masaya, Mr. de Blasio had an epiphany, he
recalled. It came in the form of a map posted on the wall, which showed
the precise location of every family in town. The doctors used it as a
blueprint for door-to-door efforts to spread the word about the
importance of immunizations and hygiene.
The idea was simple, but Mr. de Blasio saw it as a symbol of what a
robust government, extremely attuned to community needs, could achieve.
“There was something I took away from that — how hands-on government has
to be, how proactive, how connected to the people it must be,” he said.
Overseeing Aid Efforts
Communists, traitors, radicals: Many epithets were leveled against the
American supporters of the revolutionary Nicaraguan government.
“The United States was doing something illegal and immoral, and our
struggle was to end that,” said Dolly Pomerleau, a founder of the
Quixote Center.
In 1987, Mr. de Blasio was hired as a political organizer, soon after he
finished graduate school at Columbia, earning $12,000 a year. He worked
inside the Quixote Center’s Maryland office, converted apartments filled
with homegrown squash and peace posters. Hunched over his desk with a
phone to his ear — his colleagues likened him to “Big Bird with a beard”
— he oversaw efforts to solicit and ship millions of dollars in food,
clothing and supplies to Nicaragua. He also proved to be a skilled
provocateur, twice being arrested during rallies against United States
foreign policy that were held in the Washington area.
It was not the first time Mr. de Blasio had dabbled in political
protest. Growing up in Cambridge, Mass., he had spoken out as a high
school student against the spread of nuclear power. As an undergraduate
at New York University, he was a co-founder of a coalition to push for
greater financial transparency and more student feedback at the school.
Mr. de Blasio traces his idealism in part to his parents, who were both
intellectuals with activist streaks. His mother was a writer and union
member, and his father, an economist, had led an effort to push for
higher wages for maids as a student at Yale.
His parents were shaken during World War II, when his mother, then
working at the Office of War Information in New York, was accused of
being a Communist for attending a concert featuring a Soviet band.
Mr. de Blasio said his mother’s troubles left him with “a sense of not
being paralyzed in the face of injustice, not accepting a lie and being
scared because of the popularity of a lie.”
Later, when his mother began to have doubts about her plan to write a
book about the Italian resistance, focused on themes of social upheaval,
it was Mr. de Blasio who made sure she finished it.
Committed to a Cause
After more than a year in the trenches at the Quixote Center, Mr. de
Blasio had begun to miss the round-the-clock rhythms and Italian food of
New York City. So he took a job in the city at a nonprofit organization
focused on an area he knew well — improving health care in Central
America — and, shortly thereafter, joined the mayoral campaign of David
N. Dinkins.
His activism did not stop. In the cramped Lower Manhattan headquarters
of the Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater New York, where he
volunteered, Mr. de Blasio learned to cause a stir. He and a ragtag team
of peace activists, Democrats, Marxists and anarchists attempted to
bring attention to a Central American cause that, after the Sandinistas
lost power in a 1990 election, was fading from public view. “The
Nicaraguan struggle is our struggle,” said a poster designed by the group.
The activists tried everything: brandishing George H. W. Bush masks on
subway cars, advertising parties to celebrate the Cuban revolution and
hawking subscriptions to the international edition of Barricada. (Mr. de
Blasio, who was living in a basement apartment in Astoria, Queens, was
one of the first to sign up.)
Despite some debate over whether it should support only humanitarian
causes, the Nicaragua Solidarity Network held dances to benefit the
Sandinista party. “They gave a new definition to democracy,” Mr. de
Blasio told The New York Times in 1990 in an article about the wistful
reaction of American activists to the defeat of the Sandinistas. “They
built a democracy that was striving to be economic and political, that
pervaded all levels in society.”
At a retreat later that year, members of the network were asked to
articulate their visions for society. One suggested a “real peace
movement,” according to minutes of the meeting. “Rewards for altruism,”
another said. Mr. de Blasio suggested “democratic socialism.”
In a recent interview, Mr. de Blasio said his views then — and now —
represented a mix of admiration for European social democratic
movements, Mr. Roosevelt’s New Deal and liberation theology.
Mr. de Blasio remained supportive of the Sandinistas, often referred to
by their acronym, F.S.L.N., even after they lost power. “People who had
shallow party sympathies with the F.S.L.N. pretty much dropped
everything when they lost,” said Jane Guskin, a fellow activist in the
solidarity group. “Bill wasn’t like that.”
He has remained interested in Latin America — he even honeymooned in
Cuba (in violation of a United States travel ban). To this day, he
speaks admiringly of the Sandinistas’ campaign, noting advances in
literacy and health care. “They had a youthful energy and idealism mixed
with a human ability and practicality that was really inspirational,” he
said.
But Mr. de Blasio said he was also not blind to the party’s
imperfections. He said the revolutionary leaders were “not free enough
by any stretch of the imagination,” pointing to their efforts to crack
down on dissent by shuttering newspapers and radio stations.
A Shift in Focus
By the beginning of 1990, Mr. de Blasio had a foot in two worlds —
government official by day, activist by night.
He was becoming a part of the institution he had railed against — the
establishment — as a low-level aide to Mr. Dinkins in City Hall. On the
side, he helped raise funds for the Nicaragua Solidarity Network and
forge alliances between New York and Nicaraguan labor unions.
Mr. de Blasio’s answering machine greetings in those days seemed to
reflect a search for meaning. Every few weeks, he recorded a new
message, incorporating a quote to reflect his mood — a passage from
classic literature, lyrics from a song or stanzas of a poem.
Increasingly, he was distressed by what he saw as “timidity” in the
Democratic Party, as it moved to the political center in the dawning of
the Clinton era, and he thought the government should be doing more to
help low-income workers and maintain higher tax rates.
In 1991, at one of his final meetings with the Nicaragua Solidarity
Network, he argued that the liberal values the group had defended were
“far from dead” around the world, with blossoming movements in places
like Mexico, the Philippines, El Salvador and Brazil, according to
minutes of the meeting. He spoke of a need to understand and build
alliances with Islam, predicting it would soon be a dominant force in
politics.
Over time, he became more focused on his city job, and using the tools
of government to effect change. The answering machine messages stopped
changing. He no longer attended meetings about Nicaragua.
His friends in the solidarity movement were puzzled. At a meeting early
in 1992, Mr. de Blasio was marked absent. A member scribbled a note next
to his name: “Must be running for office.”
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at:
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com