======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


I think this is mostly scholastic nonsense. That fact that Lenin didn't
append "party" to his mention of the Mensheviks or Bolsheviks is wholly
irrelevant unless Louis is channeling Pham Bihn's "There never was any
split in the RSDLP".

The overall conxtext of all these pre-1914 and pre-1917 commentaries by
Lenin was contextualized by a large, broad social-democratic movement
internationally. Such a movement had *little* manifestation on the ground
in Russia itself. Few of the papers in the post-1912 period (when the
Bolsheviks consolidated their *control* over *their* wing of the RSDLP).
Effectively you had two parties competing and barely meeting together as
some sort of united "RSDLP" (though it did happen, most notably the RSDLP
organization in Minsk and other parts of Byelorussia).

The factoids as presented says nothing about the actual relationship
between the two RDSLP groups.

David Walters
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to