======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


http://www.ft-ci.org/Ukraine-The-dispute-between-Russia-and-the-imperialist-powers?lang=en


Ukraine: The dispute between Russia and the imperialist powers

06/03/2014

In the last week, Ukraine has turned into a battlefield for what many
analysts are already calling a "new cold war" between the United States
(and the European Union), on the one hand, and Russia, on the other, where
there are big economic and geopolitical interests in play. The imperialist
powers are trying to capitalize on the fall of Yanukovych's pro-Russian
government and its replacement by a pro-European government, to advance in
pulling Ukraine out of Russia's sphere of influence and align Ukraine with
the interests of the United States and the EU, which includes NATO's
military expansion up to the borders of Russia. As a response, President
Vladimir Putin deployed tens of thousands of soldiers on the western border
with Ukraine and increased the military presence in the Crimean peninsula,
a strategic region where the Russian Black Sea fleet is docked, under the
pretext of protecting the Russian-speaking majority of the population. He
even considered the possibility of a bigger incursion in eastern Ukraine,
up to the secession of Crimea. This was a message from Putin that he is not
going to stay with arms crossed, watching how the Western powers set up a
fence around Russia. Obama and other imperialist chiefs of state responded
with threats of imposing economic sanctions on Russia. But Putin seems to
have read correctly the divergent interests and the situation of weakness
in which the both the United States and the EU find themselves, to realize
sanctions. At press time, the situation seemed to have moved back from its
highest point of tension. The threats and military escalations yielded
their place to feverish diplomacy, to find a negotiated solution. Over and
above the historical analogies with the First and Second World Wars, that
circulated in the media, neither the United States nor the European Union
is ready to go to war for Ukraine, that is, a war against Russia, the
extent and consequences of which cannot be foreseen. However, this crisis,
the biggest at least since the end of the Cold War, is far from having been
ended, and, although it is possible that some pragmatic agreement will be
reached between the pro-Western and pro-Russian groups that will allow
reestablishing a certain stability, other scenarios, less probable but more
catastrophic, among them, the partition of Ukrainian territory, cannot be
ruled out entirely.

*Contradictions and weaknesses*

The Ukrainian crisis has highlighted the contradictions and limits of the
imperialist powers to respond to the Russian challenge. In the context of
its hegemonic decline, and leaving aside the military option of a NATO
intervention (outside of all calculation), the policy of the United States
was to threaten to impose marginal economic sanctions on any member of the
Russian government and other penalties, like excluding Russia from the
Group of Eight. However, it is not clear that it could impose them; without
going further in 2008, during the brief war between Russia and Georgia, the
US government approved economic sanctions against the Russian regime that
never took effect. The European Union, although it supported the uprising
against Yanukovych, and it seeks to incorporate Ukraine into its economic
and military sphere, cannot endorse a regime of economic sanctions, since
that would go against the interests of its main members. Supplying the
European Union's energy depends on gas it imports from Russia. Russia is
not only the main supplier of Germany's energy, but also its fourth-largest
commercial partner outside of the European Union. France has big
investments in the Russian automotive industry, in addition to the fact
that London and other cities have the big financial deals of the main
Russian oligarchs. This explains the mainly pro-negotiation line of the EU,
especially that of Merkel, who even opposes implementing slight sanctions,
that seek a balance between penalizing the Russian offensive on Crimea, but
without that affecting their economic relationships.

In these contradictions, Russia is playing in order to conceal its own
weakness. Since the disintegration of the former Soviet Union in 1991, and
taking advantage of the chaos of the first years of the capitalist
restoration under Yeltsin's government, with the resulting economic,
political and social decline of the former USSR, the United States advanced
on Russia and its zone of influence, although it was not able to turn
Russia into a semi-colonial country. With Putin's arrival in power, this
course of disintegration began to be reversed. Putin established a
Bonapartist regime, strengthening the state's authority; he took tight
control of the country's main resources, confronting even some of the
oligarchs that had kept the spoils from the privatizations; he reconverted
Russia from an old industrial power into a country exporting oil and gas,
thoroughly profiting from the high prices of these raw materials, and he
repaired its army. This has led, in the most recent years, to Russia's
making a come-back as a regional power and to its trying to resist the
political offensive of the Western powers on its own closer sphere of
influence, by deploying a series of initiatives like the Euro-Asiatic
Customs Union or subsidizing the price of gas, although in no way turning
into a great power: its economy is increasingly revenue-based and depends
on the price of oil and gas. On the geopolitical plane, three former Soviet
Republics, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and the rest of the Warsaw Pact
allies, have entered NATO.

*For an independent, working-class and socialist Ukraine*

The Ukrainian workers and groups of the poor are bargaining chips in this
plot of economic and geopolitical interests of the imperialist powers and
Russia. In the two decades of capitalist restoration, with both pro-Russian
and pro-Western governments, the oligarchs (former members of the Stalinist
regime, who became magnates with the capitalist restoration) have looted
state property, keeping the main businesses.

The Ukrainian economy was severely hit by the capitalist crisis and the
fall in the price of steel, one of its main exports. In 2009 alone, the GDP
fell by 15%. The crisis in the EU made conditions worse. To maintain the
value of the local currency, the hryvnia, the Central Bank practically
liquidated its reserves, that fell from 40 billion dollars in 2011 to 12
billion in 2014. Finally, the Central Bank let the hryvnia fall, and it
suffered a severe devaluation, increasing the burden of debt denominated in
foreign currency; it put extreme measures on banking customers in place, to
prevent the collapse of the banking system.

While Yanukovych wavered between approaching the EU and keeping his
relationships with Russia, in accordance with the interests of the elite of
local oligarchs, the neo-liberal government, that took office last week,
formed by the pro-Western parties and groups from the far right, has
already announced that it will have to take anti-popular measures (they
went so far as to talk about "suicidal policies"), and it will have to make
a commitment to the adjustment, in exchange for financial aid from its
friends of the IMF and the EU. These structural reforms, as already seen in
Greece or in Spain, involve a decline in wages, factory closures, layoffs,
privatizations and reduction of public spending.

Putin's military and political maneuvers, including his claim to Crimea and
his alleged defense of Ukrainian autonomy, have nothing to do with fighting
imperialism, but with defending the interests of Russian capitalism and its
geopolitical positions. Meanwhile, the supposed Ukrainian "nationalists"
are stirring up anti-Russian hatred, even going so far as to prohibit the
use of the Russian language, that millions of Ukrainian citizens speak, but
those "nationalists" are kneeling in front of the IMF and Brussels.

The interests of the Ukrainian workers and groups of the poor are
diametrically opposed to these two reactionary factions and to their
domestic agents. The Maidan Square mobilizations, although they had
economic shortages and the anger against a corrupt and repressive
government as a background, did not raise a program that would permit a
working-class solution to the crisis; rather, they were aligned with the
neo-liberal opposition, with a pro-European Union and extreme nationalist
program, which was expressed in the prominent role that neo-Nazi groups
played. For that reason, the fall of Yanukovych, was not the victory of the
"democratic revolution," as tendencies like the LIT and the comrades of
Izquierda Socialista suppose, but the replacement of one capitalist clique
by another.

Ukrainian nationalism has its historical roots in the oppression exercised
by Russia that goes back to the Czarist empire. After the 1917 Russian
Revolution, Ukraine voluntarily joined the USSR in 1922, but Stalin again
employed national oppression against the Ukrainian people, which involved a
brutal famine at the beginning of 1930, with the policy of forced
collectivization, and the deportation of the Tatar population from Crimea
to the Republics of Central Asia. Against the Stalinist policy, Trotsky
raised the right to Ukraine's self-determination. That oppression fed
anti-Russian hatred and pushed the Ukrainian nationalists to collaborate
with the Nazis during the Second World War.

Now, in Crimea, both Russia and the pro-Western parties are playing the
card of nationalism for their own reactionary ends, which could lead to the
possibility of the division of Ukrainian territory into areas under the
influence and protection of the imperialist powers and Russia.

Only the working class can give a progressive solution. The only realistic
perspective so that Ukraine will be independent is to expropriate the
oligarchs - the new capitalists that kept the big public enterprises - to
stop paying the foreign debt, nationalize banking, foreign trade and the
main resources of the economy and put them at the service of the workers
and groups of the poor, that is, to fight for a workers' and socialist
Ukraine, with democratic rights for all the ethnic and national groups.
This would be a lever for the social revolution in Russia and Europe,
where, ultimately, the fate of Ukraine will be decided.
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to