********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

Greece: The gathering storm

The Corner newsletter
European business news

ATHENS | By Nick Malkoutzis via MacroPolis |
As the dust settles from Greece’s negotiations with its lenders and
the arduous work of implementing their agreement begins, it is
becoming increasingly evident that the next four months will be an
extremely testing experience for everyone concerned.

There are several reasons to begin bracing for the turbulence ahead.
One is that the new Greek government is still on a steep learning
curve and is liable to make slip-ups. It’s apparent determination not
to keep its own counsel and the tendency for its ministers to speak
into any and all microphones put in front of them is compounding the
problems it faces.

On Wednesday, three ministers gave three different messages about what
the government plans to do with VAT. On the same day, Finance Minister
Yanis Varoufakis suggested that Greece would have trouble paying its
1.6-billion-euro loan repayment to the International Monetary Fund,
while Economy Minister Giorgos Stathakis insisted that the government
did not have any funding problems. A day later, State Minister Alekos
Flambouraris indicated that the government might indeed be unable to
pay the IMF in full and could ask for part of the repayment to be
delayed.

This picture of confusion is in contrast to the persistently blunt
message being broadcast from German Finance Minister Wolfgang
Schaeuble. After rubbing salt into the Greek side’s wounds after the
Eurogroup deal on February 20, when he wondered aloud how Varoufakis
would explain the agreement in Athens, the German politician has
maintained extreme pressure on the SYRIZA–Independent Greeks
coalition. Ahead of the vote in the German Parliament, he insisted
that no money would be released to Greece unless it completes the
review and made it clear that failure to live up to the terms would
lead to the agreement being declared null and void.

Schaeuble also accused Varoufakis of “straining the solidarity of
European partners”. It was just one of several personal jibes from the
German minister towards his Greek counterpart. These comments carry
dual significance. Firstly, because Schaeuble sets the tone for the
rest of the Eurogroup, as underlined by the fact that Eurogroup chief
Jeroen Dijsselbloem, European Commissioner Pierre Moscovici and IMF
managing director Christine Lagarde negotiated on February 20 with
Varoufakis in one room and Schaeuble in another to thrash out a deal
before the meeting of the eurozone finance ministers began.

Schaeuble’s insistence is also significant because it gives an idea of
how fraught the process of implementing the agreed reforms and then
having them reviewed by lenders is going to be for Greece over the
next four months. Since the beginning of the bailout process in 2010,
Germany has turned towards the IMF to act as its enforcer on the
ground, believing that the European Central Bank and the European
Commission do not have the expertise or resolve to ensure that terms
are being met. The way that Schaeuble appeared to try to sideline the
Commission’s efforts to find a compromise with the Greek government
before February 20 suggests that these reservations still exist in
Berlin. This means Schaeuble and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are
likely to turn to the IMF again over the next few months to ensure
that they are getting their money’s worth from the coalition in
Athens. This is where the next concern about how the process will
evolve over the next few months arises.

While the Commission, the Eurogroup and the ECB signed off relatively
easily on the reform package proposed by the Greek government on
February 23, the IMF adopted a more dissenting line. In her response
to the proposals, Lagarde recognised the Greek proposals as a “valid
starting point” but raised a number of concerns about elements that
appeared to be missing or were not covered in enough detail. These
included reforms for pensions, VAT, opening up closed sectors,
privatisations and the labour market – all of which are political hot
potatoes in Greece.

“As you know, we consider such commitments and undertakings to be
critical for Greece’s ability to meet the basic objectives of its
Fund-supported program, which is why these are the areas subject to
most of the structural benchmarks agreed with the Fund,” added
Lagarde, indicating that regardless of what the new government has
agreed with the Eurogroup, the IMF will still be looking for Greece to
deliver in areas where the previous coalition failed.

Lagarde’s response seems to leave only limited room for flexibility
and suggests that the government will be asked to delve into a lot of
areas that it would prefer to leave untouched at this stage given the
already fragile state of unity within SYRIZA. However, the way the
Fund, driven by rules and procedures, works means that Athens will
have to meet specific structural benchmarks before it can qualify for
further loans. This means the current coalition cannot escape the
nightmarish reviews that its predecessor approach with a mixture of
dread and panic if it expects to receive the IMF’s 3.5 billion euros
from the total of 7.2 billion in pending instalments.

Schaeuble, meanwhile, has insisted that Greece will not get a cent of
the remaining part of the tranches if it does not complete the review.
This ties Athens down to the incredibly testing process of working
with lenders to draft and pass legislation so the review can be
wrapped up. At the same time, it will have to ensure that it does not
alienate creditors by adopting measures that run counter to their
goals. There has already been some friction over privatisation,
payment plans for overdue taxes and plans for the settlement of
non-performing loans. Also, the various sides have not yet sat down to
discuss the complex and extremely technical issue of the fiscal gap
and any relevant measures that need to be taken.

All this forms an extremely challenging environment for the new
government, which has no experience of this process and will also have
to launch, in parallel, discussions about what kind of package can be
agreed to carry Greece on from July, when the current four-month
extension ends. This suggests the next four months will be the most
definitive period of the Greek crisis.
<http://www.thecorner.eu/news-europe/greece-gathering-storm/44213>


Greece's fundamental problem, lack of income, hasn't changed
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/greeces-fundamental-problem-lack-of-income-hasnt-changed-10082649.html>

IMF Stands Firm, Forcing Greece and Syriza to Accept Hard Concessions
<http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/15210/imf-stands-firm-forcing-greece-and-syriza-to-accept-hard-concessions>

Greek FinMin: There’s an Alternative if Greece Doesn’t Get Loan Tranche in March
<http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/03/05/greek-finmin-theres-an-alternative-if-greece-doesnt-get-loan-tranche-in-march>

Tough talk from Greece stuns EU leaders
<http://www.iol.co.za/business/international/tough-talk-from-greece-stuns-eu-leaders-1.1826736#.VPk2k3uNfQU>


Athens faces uphill struggle despite eurozone deal
Ferdinando Giugliano, Economics Correspondent
Financial Times
March 4, 2014

The Greek government received a boost last month when it reached
agreement with its eurozone creditors on a four-month extension of the
country’s €172bn rescue programme. But while Alexis Tsipras, prime
minister, believes Athens “has turned a new page”, the economic
outlook has shown little sign of improvement since his administration
came to power in January.
. . .
1) The economy reversed gear . . .

The crisis left deep scars on the Greek economy, with national income
contracting by almost 25 per cent between 2008 and 2013. Growth
returned in the first nine months of last year as gross domestic
product rose by an average of 0.6 per cent quarter-on-quarter. But
this progress was partly undone in the three months to December amid
profound political instability as the government led by Antonis
Samaras failed to elect a new president, triggering a general
election.

In the fourth quarter last year, Greece’s national output shrank by
0.4 per cent. Consumption was stable compared with the previous
quarter, while investment jumped by 18.3 per cent. But exports fared
badly, falling by 1.3 per cent even when seasonally adjusted. With
imports rising by 6.8 per cent, net exports proved a significant drag
on growth.

National output was still 1.3 per cent larger than in the last quarter
of 2013, but this was because of the economy’s bounce at the start of
the year.

2) . . . and the slide has not stopped

Indices of economic activity show the slide in output is likely to
have continued in January and February. The purchasing managers' index
for manufacturing stood at 48.4 in February after falling to 48.3 in
January. Both figures are below 50, the point that separates expansion
from contraction, and mark a deceleration compared to the first six
months of 2014, when manufacturing staged a tentative recovery.

New orders fell sharply in February, with exports sliding on the back
of political uncertainty. There was some good news for employment,
which rose modestly.

3) Deflation has worsened

Greece has been mired in deflation for two years, with prices last
growing on a yearly basis in February 2013. The trend has worsened in
the past few months, with inflation hitting -2.8 per cent in January.

The decline is partly the result of the sharp contraction in global
oil prices . Transport prices, which include petrol, diesel and other
fuels, contracted by 6.9 per cent in the 12 months to January, while
housing costs, which include heating, fell by 8 per cent.

However, falling energy prices are only part of the explanation. All
item categories with the exception of alcoholic beverages and tobacco
experienced deflation in the year to January. The trend is unlikely to
have stopped in February: data from Markit show manufacturers
continued to slash prices last month to halt faltering sales, making
the steepest price cuts since last August.

4) The government is running out of cash

Greece’s rescue programme was designed to put Athens’ public finances
on a more sustainable path. But the stringent austerity administered
by the European institutions and International Monetary Fund initially
failed to improve the public accounts as the ensuing recession led to
a steep fall in tax receipts.

Eventually, Greece managed to put its fiscal house in order. In 2013
and 2014 the government ran a primary surplus — that is, balancing its
books before interest payments.

This achievement has important political implications. Since Athens
only needs to borrow to pay its creditors, it can threaten to walk
away from its debts knowing it will still be able to pay pensioners
and public sector employees. This strengthens its hand in any
negotiations with creditors.

Since December, however, tax receipts have been weaker than expected.
The primary surplus halved to €443m in January from €835m last year,
missing its target by €923m, according to Macropolis, the consultancy.

This may have important consequences this year. As Silvia Merler, a
researcher at think-tank Bruegel, noted: “In 2014, a large part of the
final primary surplus was built up in the first two months of the
year, with January being one of the most important months for the
collection of tax revenues.” January’s shortfall may make it hard for
Greece to hit any ambitious primary surplus target set for 2015.

5) Depositors are running away

Greece’s crisis has been accompanied by a steady outflow of cash from
the banking system, with private sector deposits falling from around
€240bn to around €150bn between 2009 and 2012. The primary driver of
this process was the fear Athens might leave the euro, prompting
capital controls and forced conversion of all deposits into steeply
devalued drachmas.

This steady bank jog ended in 2012, with Mario Draghi ’s statement
that he would do “whatever it takes” to keep the eurozone intact.
After the European Central Bank president’s words, Greek deposits
stabilised at around €160bn.

Syriza’s rise to power and the ensuing stand-off between the new
government and the rest of the eurozone prompted more investors to
withdraw their cash. Deposits fell by €12.8bn in January as balances
hit €148bn, the lowest since August 2005.

According to Jeroen Dijsselbloem, chairman of the eurogroup of finance
ministers, fears that Greece might experience a full-blown bank run
were the primary reason Athens chose to cut a deal with the rest of
the eurozone.

The question now is whether the exchange of vows between Athens and
its partners over the future of the rescue programme will be enough to
bring depositors back.

_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to