********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

I think Louis' criteria that being mentioned by the New York Times being a
criteria for what is important is ludicrous (of course again he called me
out for not recognizing his notorious sarcasm in the past so who knows?) to
the extreme. The FIT won elections in Argentina. The FIT preformed into the
double digit area in provincial elections. They are a lot smaller than
SYRIZA is even when the latter started out a few years ago. Of course Louis
might now know this since, well, he relies on the NYT for all things left
in Latin America, or so he implies. The Personist and national press *in*
Argetnina, that is their papers of record have *not* ignored the FIT and
have seemingly sounded the alarm of "Trotskyism" coming to threaten all
that is good and godly there.

The FIT is a hodge-podge of mostly Trot groups. There seems to be more than
just the PO (not Morenoist) and the PTS (ex-Morenoist). The problem they
have other than being highly polemical, recruiting  competition among these
groups, both of which number only between 1 and 2 thousand, is something
SYRZIA hasn't had to face: Peronism, which no one seems to recognize as
holding the loyalty of the Argentine working class *to this day*. And this
includes the FIT which also seems incapable of addressing that section of
the class that still holds loyalty to all things Peronist.

Both the PO and PTS have variously a lot of respect among workers,
including Peronist workers, who vote for their slates in union elections.
Argentina still has one of the highest rates of unionization in the world.
Both groups, however, formed the FIT only so they could get on the ballot
and maybe pull-off some election victories. They succeeded in both. But
neither resolved their differences. They are still isolated and,
*apparently* still have yet to really win over an actual "section" of the
working class or provide a pole that could be attractive to workers who
perhaps will vote for them in union or even national elections but don't
see them as "leading" anything important enough to join them or see them as
leaders of the class.

Morena in Mexico has promise, or so I'm told by Mexican friends but they
are as racked by factionalism as, it appears, similar to that FIT. The
advantage  for Morena is the person of Andres Lopez Obrador who by force of
personality and personage, is a unifying figure, despite his own adaptation
to the State (he refused for a decade to visit either Cuba or Venezuela for
fear of being tarred with the "Chavismo" brush). The other united left
front is the OPT or "Workers Political Organization" with a dozen far and
near-far left groups. It was found by the militant class struggle union,
the SME, representing Mexico's electrical union. My understanding is that
both groups (OPT and Morena work together in areas of agreement). Morena
appears to be strictly electoral, the OPT is involved in the class struggle
at the level of the street.

Louis' criticism about benchmarks, however, is well taken. It's an area I
agree with him on. The benchmark is *our class* and immediate policies
needed to alleviate the conditions of the class or sections that are in
struggle against Imperialism and their cronies in government. Any "front"
that doesn't address these issues beyond leaflets and a newspaper article
is useless. If it doesn't mobilize and fight then what good is it?

I would add that looking for models around the world is a waste of time.
This is proven over and over again. Whatever arises in Argentina today or
tomorrow will do so based on the lessons or the *Argentine* working class
and not the Mexican or Greek one.

David
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to