waistli...@aol.com wrote: <snip> > No, I have not read Hegel either and have > no desire to because I read him several times and consider him insane.
This statement seems to be contradictory - and not in the Hegelian sense. > That > is the contradcition. I read him and he makes no sense. But I stated > publicly years ago I believe all philosophy is a form of insanity. By > definition. > This insanity arises from the metabolic breach in man himself. Philosophy > is a form insanity. > It is difficult to see what this attitude has to do with Marxism in any sense of the word. IIll refrain from commenting on any of the rest of this posting. Einde O'Callaghan ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
