======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Not zero, but vastly over-rated and not justifying the hyperbole, just 
consider the facts;  not least its contribution to plant growth - see 
web-sites, of various scientists including mine at 
apling.freeservers.com/science.htm awaiting updated links.

Paddy
http://apling.freeservers.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Les Schaffer" <schaf...@optonline.net>
To: <e.c.apl...@btinternet.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Global Warming again


======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Paddy Apling wrote:
> Events of the last few weeks show clealy that the time has come to 
> properly consider and discuss the science of climate

where you been Paddy, that's been going on for decades. you just don't
like the results to date. any other scientist knows its not just models,
tho they are important. there is proxy data, there is measurements. you
are surprisingly inept at making sound scientific assessment about
climate science, yet you talk as if you know what you are saying. in
this regard, you ARE in the camp of climate change denialists. all heat,
no light. but you are following the good rule of propaganda, just say NO!.

so, Paddy, you think the sensitivity of the climate to CO2 changes is
EXACTLY zero, is that your position?



Les


Nature Geoscience
Published online: 6 December 2009

Earth system sensitivity inferred from Pliocene modelling and data

Daniel J. Lunt, Alan M. Haywood, Gavin A. Schmidt, Ulrich Salzmann, Paul
J. Valdes & Harry J. Dowsett

Abstract

Quantifying the equilibrium response of global temperatures to an
increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations is one of the
cornerstones of climate research. Components of the Earth's climate
system that vary over long timescales, such as ice sheets and
vegetation, could have an important effect on this temperature
sensitivity, but have often been neglected. Here we use a coupled
atmosphere–ocean general circulation model to simulate the climate of
the mid-Pliocene warm period (about three million years ago), and
analyse the forcings and feedbacks that contributed to the relatively
warm temperatures. Furthermore, we compare our simulation with proxy
records of mid-Pliocene sea surface temperature. Taking these lines of
evidence together, we estimate that the response of the Earth system to
elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations is 30–50% greater
than the response based on those fast-adjusting components of the
climate system that are used traditionally to estimate climate
sensitivity. We conclude that targets for the long-term stabilization of
atmospheric greenhouse-gas concentrations aimed at preventing a
dangerous human interference with the climate system should take into
account this higher sensitivity of the Earth system.

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/e.c.apling%40btinternet.com



________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to