======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


U.S. Keeps Foreign Ph.D.s
Despite Fears of a Post-9/11 Drop, Most Science, Engineering Post-Grads Have 
Stayed
By DAVID WESSEL
Wall Street Journal
January 26 2010

Most foreigners who came to the U.S. to earn doctorate degrees in science and 
engineering stayed on after graduation—at least until the recession 
began—refuting predictions that post-9/11 restrictions on immigrants or 
expanding opportunities in China and India would send more of them home.

Newly released data revealed that 62% of foreigners holding temporary visas who 
earned Ph.D.s in science and engineering at U.S. universities in 2002 were 
still in the U.S. in 2007, the latest year for which figures are available. Of 
those who graduated in 1997, 60% were still in the U.S. in 2007, according to 
the data compiled by the U.S. Energy Department's Oak Ridge Institute for 
Science and Education for the National Science Foundation.

Foreigners account for about 40% of all science and engineering Ph.D. holders 
working in the U.S., and a larger fraction in engineering, math and computer 
fields. "Our ability to continue to attract and keep foreign scientists and 
engineers is critical to…increase investment in science and technology," Oak 
Ridge analyst Michael Finn said.

"Data for all available cohorts indicate that 'stay rates' of foreign science 
and engineering doctorate recipients in 2007 are slightly higher than they have 
been in recent years," Mr. Finn said. His findings, which use tax data to track 
graduates over time, cover the years before the U.S. plunged into a recession 
that damped job prospects in many U.S. industries and universities.

Other analysts see signs that recent foreign grads are increasingly likely to 
return home, particularly in today's weak job market. "I have no doubt that the 
2009 data will show a dramatic shift," said Vivek Wadwha, executive in 
residence at Duke University's Pratt School of Engineering, who has been 
warning loudly about the threat that trend would pose to innovation in the U.S. 
In October 2008, Mr. Wadwha and others used Facebook to question 1,224 
foreigners studying at U.S. institutions at all levels. More than half the 
Indians and 40% of the Chinese said they hoped to return home within five years.

Separate NSF surveys show the fraction of foreign Ph.D.s planning to stay in 
the U.S. dipped in the years following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack and 
then rebounded. Nearly 80% of those with temporary visas surveyed in 2007 said 
they planned to stay; more than half had definite plans to do so.

Joy Ying Zhang, the son of a primary-school teacher and a college professor, 
left China's Hunan Province in 1999 for Detroit's Wayne State University, where 
he arrived with two suitcases and $2,000 in cash. He later transferred to 
Carnegie Mellon University, which awarded him a Ph.D. in computer science in 
2008.

Four or five of his friends have returned to China, he said, and he has 
discussed doing so. But Mr. Zhang, now a research assistant professor at 
Carnegie Mellon's Silicon Valley campus, has decided stay. "I have spent 10 
years here already," he said. "It took me some time to get used to American 
life. Now, it'd be hard to get used to China. It's called 'reverse culture 
shock.' " Mr. Zhang, 35 years old, has a brother who works for a pharmaceutical 
company in the U.S. and a sister who is a physician in China and close to their 
parents.

In recruiting for Carnegie Mellon, he finds young Chinese less eager to come to 
the U.S. than those of his generation. "Life in China is getting better. There 
are research alternatives in China—like Microsoft China," he said. "They can 
get good mentoring and advice there, instead of coming to the U.S."

In 2007, foreign citizens accounted for 16,022 of the Ph.D.s awarded in science 
and engineering in the U.S., or 46% of the total, according to the Oak Ridge 
data. In contrast, the class of 1997 had 12,966 foreigners, or 30% of the total.

Graduates of Ph.D. programs in the physical sciences and computer science are 
more likely to remain in the U.S. than those in other fields, Mr. Finn said. 
Those programs are popular with Chinese and Indian students, who are more 
likely to remain in the U.S. after completing studies than those from Taiwan, 
South Korea and Western Europe. Among 2002 graduates, 92% of the Chinese and 
81% of the Indians were in the U.S. after five years; in contrast, 41% of South 
Koreans and 52% of Germans were.

Aranyak Mehta, 31, came from India nearly a decade ago to study the science of 
algorithms at Georgia Institute of Technology and earned a Ph.D. in 2005. 
Today, he is a research scientist at Google—and planning, for now, to remain in 
the U.S. "There's always a trade-off—family, culture, and all that," he said. 
"One of the most important things with an academic background is the work that 
you do, and is it exciting? I'm not saying there is no exciting work in India. 
Many people have gone back and started companies."

Using the LinkedIn online network, Mr. Wadhwa identified 1,203 skilled Indians 
and Chinese who had returned home. Three-quarters said visa issues weren't a 
factor. Rather, career opportunities, quality-of-life concerns and family ties 
were major factors. Some 70% of the Chinese and 61% of the Indians said 
opportunities for professional advancement were better at home.

The NSF recently said the number of foreign science and engineering students 
enrolled in graduate programs of all types hit 158,430 in April 2009, up 8% 
from the year before.
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to