======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


The corollary to a floundering, moribund economy 
in terminal decay is war-talk.  And that's 
precisely what's happening right now under the 
pretext of ending Iran's nuclear program.

Here's another article, this one from Friday's 
Financial Times on the campaign to intimidate and 
bribe Brazil.

Hopefully, before it's too late, the left in the 
United States will mobilize against this campaign 
and stave off what appears to be, based upon the 
rhetoric from both sides, an increasingly 
inevitable war with stakes that goes way beyond 
the control of anyone involved.

Solidarity,
Shawn

-----

US woos Brazil over Iran nuclear dispute

By Daniel Dombey in Washington and Jonathan Wheatley in São Paulo
Published: February 26 2010 20:34 | Last updated: February 26 2010 20:34

The dispute over Iran's nuclear programme is 
casting a shadow over the Americas as Hillary 
Clinton heads south to push Brazil to take a 
tougher approach towards Iran.

The US secretary of state will on Sunday embark 
on a week-long tour of South and Central America. 
Brazil, which is deepening its ties with Tehran 
and resisting Washington's drive for United 
Nations sanctions, is to be the main focus of 
attention.

In a preparatory move, William Burns, the state 
department official leading the sanctions drive, 
travelled to Brasília on Friday. "Brazil is an 
emerging power with growing influence in the 
region and around the world, and we believe that 
with that influence comes responsibility," said 
the state department.

But, in a sign of its increasing self-confidence, 
the administration of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva 
remains at odds with Washington over one of the 
US's top international priorities.

Brazil is on the UN Security Council, where the 
US is looking for consensus for sanctions in 
coming weeks but faces additional resistance from 
China, Turkey and Lebanon.

The Obama administration is particularly 
concerned about Mr Lula da Silva's calls this 
week for the world not to isolate Iran. The US is 
seeking to increase such isolation through 
sanctions until Tehran is more eager to negotiate.

"They have largely given Iran a pass on the 
nuclear issue," says a US diplomat. "We see 
increasingly suspicions in the world as to what 
Iran is doing, whereas Brazil is heading in the 
opposite direction."

Washington was dismayed to see the Brazilian 
president exchange hugs with his Iranian 
counterpart when Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad visited the 
country in November. Mr Lula da Silva intends to 
pay a return visit to Tehran in May, with 
increasing trade ties at the top of the agenda.

Mrs Clinton also sent out a coded message to 
Brazil when she expressed her fears this month 
that Iran was "moving toward a military 
dictatorship".

Brasília has made clear its aversion to coups 
within Latin America - and has been at odds with 
the US over what it sees as Washington's 
overeagerness to live with the results of a coup 
in Honduras last year.

But Mr Lula da Silva's government is keen to set 
out its own diplomatic path and has bristled at 
international efforts in the past to divide 
countries into nuclear "haves" and "have nots", 
forging ahead with an uranium enrichment project 
despite reservations in the US and elsewhere.
Brazil also holds out hope of a compromise on the 
current nuclear dispute with Iran, despite 
arguments from the US and its European allies 
that Tehran has spurned Washington's efforts at 
engagement.  

"Our view is that the possibilities for 
negotiation are a long way from being exhausted," 
said Roberto Jaguaribe, the official responsible 
for relations with Iran at Brazil's foreign 
ministry. He called for "quiet" rather than 
"loud" diplomacy.

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to