======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================



Speaking of electronics and the law of value, here is an article by Guido 
Starosta, a colleague of Juan Iñigo Carrera, on the Global Value Chain (GVC) 
approach, a sort of Wallersteinian theory that purportedly addresses the 
problems of competition in global chains of electronics production:
The Changing Dynamics of Value production and ‘Capture’ in theElectronics 
Global Value Chain: A Marxian Perspective
http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/PEI/publications/wp/documents/Starosta01-09.pdf
Let me quote what the aim of the article is, which is elaborated further on by 
developing how Marxtreated capitals of different sizes, and how the simpler 
form of the law of value is actually unfoldedin what mistakenly, as I see it, 
became the monopoly capital era:
"Two major weaknesses can be observed in this account (Starosta, 2008b). First, 
whilst thereis no doubt that some firms have more power than others to 
‘capture’ value (and hence have ahigher rate of profit) this is simply an 
empirical fact that requires explanation. Surely, the GVCapproach attempts to 
ground the differentiation of ‘value-capturing’ capacities in the 
exclusivepossession of ‘scarce assets’ by lead firms. But this analytically 
displaces the phenomenon to beexplained one step further. For why is it that 
certain capitals systematically have a greater potentialto appropriate scarce 
assets whilst others have no access to those means of capitalist 
competition?Perhaps one could argue that lead firms possess the magnitude of 
capital or access to financialresources necessary to generate their own 
barriers to entry, whilst lesser chain members do not(Rutherford and Holmes, 
2008). But this will not do the trick either. It simply begs the question ofwhy 
in certain branches of the division of social labour capitals of a particularly 
restrictedmagnitude systematically prevail despite the general tendency for the 
concentration andcentralisation of capital characterising capitalist 
production. In a nutshell, one of the centralproblems with the GVC’s ‘theory of 
value capture’ is that it actually assumes what needs to beexplained, i.e. the 
systematic differentiation of capitals of stratified valorisation capacities.
Second, the GVC approach fails to grasp the relations among individual capitals 
beyond
their immediate appearances. It is thereby unable to uncover the content of the 
phenomenon under
investigation behind its outward manifestations and actually inverts the latter 
into the very cause of
the phenomenon itself. Thus, it sees the constitution of commodity chains as 
essentially governed
by direct social relations of command (or maybe co-operation). This overlooks 
the essentially
indirect nature of the general social relation that regulates capitalist 
society, namely, the generalised
production and exchange of commodities. A proper explanation of the social 
constitution of GVC
should therefore show why the indirect establishment of the general unity of 
the division of labour
through the commodity-form becomes eventually mediated by relatively enduring 
direct social
relations on particular nodes of the overall process of social production. 
Building on the Marxian
law of value, the following section offers such an alternative account of the 
content and form of
GVC."
I will come back to this in a couple days (?) when I have more time. But thanks 
for keeping the discussion respectful, and by the way Joaquin, thanks for the 
link to the Silvio Rodriguez' blog.                                         
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to