======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================




Angelus Novus wrote:
> 
> 
> In other words, you're trying to take an approach to Marx exegesis and make a 
> political tendency out of it.

An anti-capitalist _movement_ cannot be built out of Marx's Critique,
even though I would hope that that critique would be a central concern
of _much_ but not all of the leadership as well as rank and file of such
a movement if it finally comes into existence. That if is a reference to
Rosa Luxemburg, whose phrase "socialism or barbarism" was not merely a
goad to 'get busy' -- it expressed the very real hisotorical possibility
of both, with perhaps barbarism being somewhat more probable. There is
no Angel of History to guaranteee all that is good and beautiful, as the
bourgoeis theory of Progress holds. Lou wants to equate political
practice with fundamental theory, which requires the existence of
something called "Marxism" which is not just a critique of political
economy but a complete philosophy of life, a theory of political action,
and an explanation of all history. 

Lou rejected the Vanguard Party but he has not in practice rejected the
premise of such a party: that there exists a true theory of revolution,
and that that theory can be derived from Marx's criticism of actually
existing capitalism.

For me the power of the critique that Lou regards as "jive" is that it
undergirds a view of anti-capitalist revolution as _necessary_, whether
or not it is either possible or will lead to a desirable world.
Capitalisms broods over human possibility, and it must be destroyed to
make room for humananity -- but that is as far as theory will carry us.
It will not assure us that humanity will make good use of the freedom
thereby achieved or of a method of achieving that destruction.. The
former (a 'good socieity') will be the task of those who come after us.
The latter (the destruction of capitalism) is what we work out in
practice under the conditions in which we find urselves at any given
time. The men and women who accomplish that task (if it is accomplished)
will have many different "world views," some related to "Marx," some
not. Their unity will come throguh their practice, not through their
abstract theory.

Carrol

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to