====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Carrol Cox <cb...@ilstu.edu> wrote: > > We are not dealing, then, with just the question of how to 'treat' > women. We are dealing with the fundamental question of how to > contributre to the building of a revolutionary movement in the u.s. I was heartened to see this contribution from Carrol. I am glad to acknowledge that I was too harsh in my rejoinder, "aw 'shucks'". I can certainly agree with the sentiment that "how to 'treat' women" is an integral part of building a revolutionary movement in the U.S. I would expect it clear to most of us that such an integration of women's rights includes making the connection that opposing the death penalty for an Iranian woman or, for that matter, the use of rape as a military and political weapon by oppressor governments would be both a point of solidarity for women and men "in the u.s." but would also raise the bar for all, especially feminists, in comprehending the revolutionary implications of learning "how to 'treat' women." -- Manuel ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
