======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


August 30 2010

[The other day, here in Idaho, we had record heat.  And the next day, Fall 
began to arrive.  Things can change and do.]

My post yesterday, "The ever harsher Winds -- but the Sun again?" so far hasn't 
drawn much comment.  On RBB, Cornet deemed the American Left "very dead" to 
which I responded, "I think the potential Left in this country is very large 
indeed."  

Ken responded with "If you add up the members of trade unions, left/liberal 
political action and lobbying groups and the various other constituencies that 
are generally taken as making up the contemporary "Left," it adds up to 
millions of people, and a pretty good chunk of the electorate in the United 
States. The
question is, how do we make it a more powerful, more effective Left."

While I don't disagree with Ken's final statement as it stands alone, I don't 
think most of that which he lists is Left at this point.  To me, that's part of 
the "potential Left" -- no more and no less.  As I see it, and I think History 
bears this out, "Left" connotes a belief that, at some points via linear trail 
and at others through "zig zag" or switch-back trails, the Left is committed to 
the public ownership of the means of production and distribution -- with 
production, not for profit, but for the common good.  To be blunt about it, 
simply belonging to a union or seeking reform as an end in itself, is not Left.

But again, there is a potential -- a powerful one -- which I am convinced will 
be activated.  And I do think the active Left in this country is considerably 
larger -- though there are still not enough of us by any stretch -- than simply 
the membership sum of the existent "radical organizations."  After all, there's 
been -- from the WTO protests more than a decade ago through the election of 
Obama, a great deal of activism, some of it genuinely Left in its thinking.

In 1957, [and I've mentioned this before], I sent a couple of articles of mine 
to Bert Cochran and his fine American Socialist magazine.  One -- which many on 
these lists have now seen -- involved the predatory activities of the oil and 
uranium mining corporations on the Navajo reservation, activities then enhanced 
by the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs.  The other piece of mine predicted wide 
spread student and related activism in this country in the relatively near 
future. Bert Cochran was happy to run the Navajo piece and did -- but he gently 
turned down the other one as unrealistic.  At that point, 1957, the active Left 
in this country, following years of witch-hunting, was minimal. In my home 
state of Arizona, a number of us, mostly students, were doing a number of 
activist things.  Some of us were in touch -- and this was, of course, long 
before computer technology -- with kindred spirits around the country.  The 
'60s loomed and the '60s came -- and to some extent, continued through the 
years.

At that point, a big piece was the still slowly developing civil rights 
movement, especially in Dixie -- soon to expand and move dramatically and, in 
addition to its own cause, sparking a number of substantive issues and battles, 
each significant in its own right.  At this point, our mounting complex of 
challenges -- e.g., economic, perennial war, environmental, and certainly civil 
rights and civil liberties, all of them compelling to an extreme, are coming at 
us from the very Four Directions.

I think those challenges will be constructively met -- and a growing number of 
people are presently engaged in that good work. And there will be more of us, 
and then many more.

And, for sure, a genuine and healthy American Left -- committed to systemic 
change -- will Feather Out,

And it will do so most effectively.  As an older friend and veteran of much 
good struggle once told me, via then in-fashion telegram, "Success will be ours 
in the long run."

Solidarity,

Hunter [Hunter Bear]

HUNTER GRAY [HUNTER BEAR/JOHN R SALTER JR] Mi'kmaq /St. Francis 
Abenaki/St. Regis Mohawk 
Protected by Na´shdo´i´ba´i´ 
and Ohkwari' 
 
Our Hunterbear website is now more than ten years old.
It contains a vast amount of social justice material -- including
much on techniques of grassroots activist organizing.
Check out http://hunterbear.org/directory.htm

See: Hunter Bear's Full and Detailed Movement Life Interview:
http://hunterbear.org/HUNTER%20BEAR%20INTERVIEW%20CRMV.htm

And See Extensive Essay on Hunter Gray: Native Roots/Identity, Social Thought
and Social Justice: [From THE JOURNAL OF INDIGENOUS THOUGHT]
http://hunterbear.org/Red%20essay%20on%20Hunter%20Gray.htm

See: The Stormy Adoption of an Indian Child [My Father] and its
accompanying essay on Minority Adoptions and Native Land
and Resources:
http://hunterbear.org/James%20and%20Salter%20and%20Dad.htm

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to