======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


On 9/25/10 3:28 AM, Gary MacLennan wrote:

>
> I didn’t get to see Jane Campion’s film on John Keats.

http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/2009-movies-wrap-up-part-three/

Bright Star; The Young Victoria

These two come from the same studio and represent the PBS Masterpiece 
Theater aesthetic raised to highest levels of boredom. “Bright Star” is 
a love story about the poet John Keats and a perfectly ordinary woman 
named Fanny Brawne who wrote about their affair when she was in her old 
age. Keats died of TB when he was only 26 years old but produced some of 
the 19th century’s greatest poems, including the one from which this 
listless movie derives its title. Directed and written by Jane Campion, 
who is best known for “The Piano”, it is lovely to look at but totally 
lacking in drama. It consists mainly of Keats and Brawne in dalliance 
with each other, like scenes from a Jane Austen novel but without the 
biting irony. Keats had little to speak of in his life other than his 
genius with verse, but it is simply impossible for a movie to convey the 
internal drama that allowed that genius to grow into full flower. So all 
we end up with is strolls through the garden until a cold rain and a 
light jacket puts Keats on his deathbed.

The director of “The Young Victoria” must have assumed that the audience 
would be entertained sufficiently by the opulence of Windsor Castle and 
similar environs and did not take the trouble to secure a decent script 
before filming. Unlike “The Queen”, the splendid dismantling of Queen 
Elizabeth and Tony Blair, this is an attempt to bolster the image of 
Queen Victoria, who is represented as a kind of proto-feminist whose 
marriage to Prince Albert supposedly ushered in a period of social 
reform that left the working class of Britain as adoring subjects. We 
are led to believe that Victoria and Albert were locked in battle with 
powerful Tory politicians who would not be happy until every drop of 
surplus value was extracted from the workers. Missing from the film is 
any consideration of Queen Victoria’s role in empire-building, a project 
that had the effect of robbing Asian and Africans in order to allow the 
British rich to build their castles and manor houses, while offering 
some crumbs from the table to the men and women of the British Isles. 
Julian Fellowes, a life-long Tory and son of a diplomat who has written 
toothless satires on the aristocracy, wrote the vapid screenplay. The 
only mystery is why Martin Scorsese helped to produce this valentine to 
the aristocracy. Perhaps Fellowes caught him in a compromising 
situation, like a scene out of one of his Mafia movies.

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to