====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22239 This article provides more details than I have seen on Assange's sexcapades with his Swedish female admirers who, for whatever motivations, later turned on him, as well as the oddities of Swedish law. It confirms that he is not charged with "rape," but with "sex by surprise" (who could cook up such a concept except a troll?). If it's true that at least one of his partner admirers asked him to undergo test for STDs and he refused, it raises the question as to why she then had sex with him, and subsequently turned on him. This would be a soap opera if it weren't for the very real threats against him now being made not just by legal authorities but by Christian fanatics issuing fatwas against him. I checked the Swedish criminal code, and couldn't find any article that defined sex without a condom (apparently, what is involved in Assange's case) as "rape." David ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
