======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


John

So I started reading this letter which sounded pretty good and it looked 
like I signed it, so I read further and discovered that it was to as a 
member of a group I didn’t know I belonged to called the “Left 
Establishment.” As I kept reading, it was a vile, toxic diatribe ending 
with a demand that I, along with the rest of the “Left Establishment”, 
endorse a demonstration this week in Washington featuring civil 
disobedience at the White House fence.

To whomever sent the letter, I have to say I’m sorry that I just don’t 
respond positively to nasty invitations. I hope you can understand. Calm 
down and tell me who you are before the conspiracy theories mushroom.

Actually, I thought the Dec. 16 action seemed somewhat justifiable in 
light of current events – the WikiLeaks releases and erupting divisions 
within the Democratic Party. And I love the people who plan to get 
arrested. Maybe a big crowd will show up, but not because it was a smart 
idea to begin with. Mid-December is not the best time to turn out masses 
of people. But stuff happens, and now many people are boiling.

My personal best to those who are being arrested. They include a former 
Pentagon official, former CIA agent, a former New York Times reporter, 
and a mother who lost a son to war and was radicalized as a result. The 
lesson for me is that people can change from hawks to doves, from spies 
to whistleblowers, if organizers organize and events reshape their 
perceptions. That’s the lesson of WikiLeaks, that folk on the inside 
sometimes come find their situation intolerable and break away from old 
thinking.

Civil disobedience is a moral expression, and can be a personal healing. 
Sometimes it ignites a larger movement, or inspires other individuals to 
step up. We need more of it.

But I also think we need an outside/inside strategy that shifts public 
opinion more and more against the war. We need to persuade the 
undecided, not simply to create images of dissent. The peace movement 
will grow steadily in the months ahead, on its own, but also in its 
relation to other compelling causes, among them: Wall Street regulation, 
clean energy/green jobs, and the steady shift towards an unfettered 
market philosophy over our lives. Civil disobedience can light a flame, 
but the case for thoroughgoing radical reform must be made on our 
streets, our workplaces, our religious institutions, and yes, within the 
Democratic Party – whose overwhelming majority support progressive 
objectives. Members of the Progressive Democrats of America, and the 
Congressional Progressive Caucus, are vital elements of our movement.

I would like every person who signed this letter to read it again, and 
be kind enough to retract their signatures or explain why.

This is not the time to inflict internal damage on a community which is 
already weak enough. It’s important to get a grip.

The peace and justice community is a fragile form of social ecology, 
with diversity being an essential quality. Everyone is entitled to a 
different approach, but there also is an essential unity that can be 
achieved, unless a malign force is introduced.

I have been working every day since 2002 to end these wars. I will never 
stop. I supported Barack Obama for president in 2008, and am glad I did 
so. At the time I also said progressives should disagree with him on 
Afghanistan, NAFTA, global warming and Wall Street, and I have pursued 
progressive alternatives every day. I have been so busy on the WikiLeaks 
crisis since August that I just haven’t had time to drop by the White 
House and pick up my marching orders.

TOM HAYDEN
Director
Peace and Justice Resource Center

* * * *

Dear Mr. Hayden,

You refer to our letter urging you to strongly support militant protest 
against the Obama administration as “vile” and “toxic”.

These words are misapplied.

Rather these are adjectives appropriately directed at the policies of 
the Obama administration, those which we mentioned, and provide 
documenting links to, along with others which we don’t. (For many of us, 
the omission the Obama administration’s disgraceful policies with 
respect to Israel and Palestine was regrettable.)

We note that you do not attempt to defend any of these noting merely 
that you remain “glad . . . that you supported Barack Obama for President.”

Rather, the main focus of your response is protest directed against 
Obama’s expansion of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, in particular, 
the civil disobedience action on Dec. 16 which you refer to as “somewhat 
justified.”

This action, and other protests to come, are not “somewhat” but 
absolutely justified on any reasonable moral, practical and political 
grounds.  They need strong unqualified support, from you and the others 
who claim to speak for the left,  not the provisional, weak endorsement 
you provide here.

You then accuse us of undermining the “fragile social ecology” required 
for growth of the peace movement.

Again, this is a charge which is not appropriately directed at us but at 
you.

For citizens do not protest only when they feel their protests are 
“somewhat” justifiable.  They do so when they are aware of the fact of 
the matter: that protest against this and numerous other Obama 
administration policies is now, and has been for some time, an urgent 
necessity.

We hope that you reconsider your continuing failure to come to terms 
with not only with the catastrophe which is the Obama administration but 
also for the damage which your insufficiently critical support has 
inflicted on the only force which has the capacity oppose it:  mass, 
organized, and militant expressions of popular protest.

We therefore thank you for this response which demonstrates far better 
than we could why you are a deserving recipient of our letter.

Best Regards,

John Halle

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to