> -------------------------
> Via Workers World News Service
> Reprinted from the July 6, 2000
> issue of Workers World newspaper
> -------------------------
>
> AFTER U.S SENATE VOTE:
> COLOMBIAN REVOLUTIONARIES VOW TO
> CONFRONT AGGRESSION
>
> By Andy McInerney
>
> The U.S. Senate took a giant step toward all-out war in
> Colombia on June 21.
>
> The Senate voted 94 to five for a billion-dollar package
> of military aid for the Colombian government. The package
> is part of a much bigger $7.5 billion "Plan Colombia" that
> is being orchestrated by the U.S. government.
>
> The reaction from Colombia was swift and defiant. "If the
> people of Colombia are threatened, we will confront the
> aggression," warned Simon Trinidad, spokesperson for the
> Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People's Army (FARC-
> EP).
>
> "The Plan Colombia will raise more Manuel Marulandas,"
> Trinidad said. Manuel Marulanda, popularly known as
> "Tirofijo"--Sureshot--is the legendary leader of the FARC-
> EP.
>
> The Colombian Communist Party issued a June 23 statement
> opposing the aid. "The approval of the Plan Colombia by the
> United States Congress shows that a new chapter of military
> intervention in Colombia is unfolding," the CCP's Executive
> Committee wrote. The party called for a national
> mobilization against the Plan Colombia.
>
> Before the Senate vote, 60 Colombian labor, human-rights
> and community groups signed a declaration to the
> international community opposing the Plan Colombia. "We
> reject the Plan Colombia because it uses an authoritarian
> concept of national security exclusively based on a
> strategy against narcotics," the statement explained.
>
> "It will lead to the escalation of the social and armed
> conflict. It fails to provide real solutions to drug
> trafficking. It attacks the Indigenous populations by
> destroying their culture and way of life."
>
> U.S. war package
>
> The $932 million approved by the Senate is primarily
> designed to bolster the Colombian armed forces. The package
> now needs to be reconciled with the $1.7 billion package
> approved by the House of Representatives.
>
> The final package--attached to a bigger appropriations
> package whose passage is all but assured--is expected to
> total at least $1.3 billion.
>
> The centerpiece is an armada of 60 combat helicopters. The
> House package includes 30 Huey II attack helicopters and 30
> advanced Blackhawk helicopters; the Senate package provides
> 60 Hueys.
>
> The package also provides funds for training three elite
> counter-insurgency battalions, expanding the number of
> Special Forces "advisers" beyond the 200-300 that the
> Pentagon admits are already there. These battalions are
> supposed to lead a "push into the south," referring to the
> FARC-EP's stronghold.
>
> The Plan Colombia is marketed in the United States as part
> of the "war on drugs." But any analysis of the aid package
> and the current situation in Colombia reveals that this is
> for public consumption only.
>
> The package is actually aimed at Colombia's powerful
> insurgencies, the FARC-EP and the National Liberation Army
> (ELN).
>
> Military aid has skyrocketed from around $50 million in
> 1998 to over $1 billion--a 20-fold increase in just two
> years. Colombia is now the third biggest recipient of U.S.
> military aid in the world.
>
> Study after study shows that drug traffickers in Colombia
> maintain close connections to both the Colombian Armed
> Forces and the political elite there. They have no
> independent armed forces.
>
> Ruling-class crisis deepens
>
> The massive aid package is designed to prop up Colombia's
> weak and notoriously corrupt ruling class. This regime is
> currently facing depression-level economic conditions as
> well as an unprecedented political and military challenge
> from both the armed insurgencies and the mass movement.
>
> Unemployment in Colombia is officially over 20 percent; in
> many areas it is over 50 percent. The Colombian peso has
> lost over half its value against the dollar in the last
> year alone.
>
> After a string of military defeats at the hands of the
> insurgencies, the government of President Andres Pastrana
> has been forced to the table for talks with the FARC-EP.
> For the last 18 months, Pastrana has ceded a five-
> municipality "demilitarized zone" to the FARC-EP so that
> talks can be carried out.
>
> The talks have featured a series of "Public Audiences," in
> which Colombians from around the country can travel to the
> zone and make proposals for how they would address the
> problems facing Colombia. These meetings have often become
> popular speak-outs against the government's economic
> policies that capitulate to the demands of the
> International Monetary Fund.
>
> In the past two years, unions have led a series of general
> strikes against Pastrana's economic policies. Peasants have
> staged blockades of highways. In June, residents of the
> Chocą province staged a general strike to protest the
> government's neglect of the region.
>
> Few believe that the Plan Colombia can resolve this deep
> crisis. "The U.S. aid is going to trigger a total crisis
> and stimulate the war," political analyst Alejo Vargas told
> USA Today on June 23.
>
> The package does signal a new level of struggle--a sign
> that U.S. imperialism will not stand by quietly while its
> representatives in Bogota are in trouble. Now U.S.
> diplomats are twisting arms in Europe to approve more aid
> at a high-level ministerial meeting in Spain in July.
>
> As opposition to the aid mounts in Colombia, Colombians
> will surely be looking to the progressive movement in the
> United States for allies and for solidarity.
>
>                          - END -
>
> (Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to
> copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
> changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
> Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)


     --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Reply via email to