[MLL] Maoists and Hoahaists?

[Hantayo000]

Comrade Javad,

Who are you talking about???

"I would like to say few things before continuing with my discussion.

I have given sufficient time to Maoists and Hoxhaists to come up with their
comments and answers to my points and questions, but as it is evident so
far, they have not said any word either by neglect or design. I mention this
because there was an agreement between me and them to investigate their two
theses through their cooperation in the form of their analyses of some of
their vague points, and answers to my questions. Probably, Maoists and
Hoxhaists want to focus on "scientific" and "dialectical" analyses of other
important issues instead of "mechanical-materialist" and "metaphysical"
arguments of their opponents regarding their supposed "social-imperialism"
of the Soviet Union, which is relevant to understanding of the collapse of
the former USSR! But do they really provide any "scientific" and
"dialectical" arguments for their other important points? In their
imaginations, they do provide these kinds of arguments by the help of a
"holy" method--insert as many politically-correct words as possible, like
"materialist", "dialectics", "contradiction", "interconnections",
"interrelations", in the texts of their assertions supporting their own
views, and insert as many politically-incorrect words as possible, like
"mechanical-materialism", "metaphysics" in the texts of their assertions
denouncing the views of their opponents. And of course, their method is
becoming popular among other "socialists" too by the force of habit when one
reads some shoddy arguments in support of the imperialist war against
Afghanistan by the help of the laughable "dialectics" of "shades of gray".
So, they are engaged either in these kinds of "scientific" and "dialectical"
arguments or in upholding their "beliefs", like the "social-imperialism" of
the USSR, originated, circulated, and maintained in the wonderful world of
their cocoons."

I have no clue who you are talking about and yet all your remarks consist of all the words I use.  It is fine if you want to disagree with me but show a little bit of integrity and attribute the comments to whom you are refering to whether or not it is me or someone else.  You are right in your assessment that if you do not have the integrity to address your remarks to the person you are refering to, they will eventually pay no attention to you.  If you are refering to me, then all I can say is that since I have never been apart of this ongoing discourse with you my attention is focused elsewhere as you can readily see.

Fraternally  Mark Scott