Chavez’s achievements
  
http://dawn.com/2006/05/15/op.htm#2

     By John Pilger
  I HAVE spent the past three weeks filming in the hillside barrios of Caracas, 
in streets and breeze-block houses that defy gravity and torrential rain and 
emerge at night like fireflies in the fog.

Caracas is said to be one of the world’s toughest cities, yet I have known no 
fear; the poorest have welcomed my colleagues and me with a warmth 
characteristic of ordinary Venezuelans but also with the unmistakable 
confidence of a people who know that change is possible and who, in their 
everyday lives, are reclaiming noble concepts long emptied of their meaning in 
the West: “reform”, “popular democracy”, “equity”, “social justice” and, yes, 
“freedom”.

The other night, in a room bare except for a single fluorescent tube, I heard 
these words spoken by the likes of Ana Lucia Fernandez, aged 86, Celedonia 
Oviedo, aged 74, and Mavis Mendez, aged 95. A mere 33-year-old, Sonia Alvarez, 
had come with her two young children. Until about a year ago, none of them 
could read and write; now they are studying mathematics. For the first time in 
its modern era, Venezuela has almost 100 per cent literacy.

This achievement is due to a national programme, called Mision Robinson, 
designed for adults and teenagers previously denied an education because of 
poverty. Mision Ribas is giving everyone a secondary school education, called a 
bachillerato. (The names Robinson and Ribas refer to Venezuelan independence 
leaders from the 19th century.)

Named, like much else here, after the great liberator Simon Bolivar, 
“Bolivarian”, or people’s, universities have opened, introducing, as one parent 
told me, “treasures of the mind, history and music and art, we barely knew 
existed”. Under Hugo Chavez, Venezuela is the first major oil producer to use 
its oil revenue to liberate the poor.

Mavis Mendez has seen, in her 95 years, a parade of governments preside over 
the theft of tens of billions of dollars in oil spoils, much of it flown to 
Miami, together with the steepest descent into poverty ever known in Latin 
America; from 18 per cent in 1980 to 65 per cent in 1995, three years before 
Chavez was elected. “We didn’t matter in a human sense,” she said. “We lived 
and died without real education and running water, and food we couldn’t afford. 
When we fell ill, the weakest died. In the east of the city, where the mansions 
are, we were invisible, or we were feared. Now I can read and write my name, 
and so much more; and whatever the rich and their media say, we have planted 
the seeds of true democracy, and I am full of joy that I have lived to witness 
it.”

Latin American governments often give their regimes a new sense of legitimacy 
by holding a constituent assembly that drafts a new constitution. When he was 
elected in 1998, Chavez used this brilliantly to decentralise, to give the 
impoverished grassroots power they had never known and to begin to dismantle a 
corrupt political superstructure as a prerequisite to changing the direction of 
the economy.

His setting-up of misions as a means of bypassing saboteurs in the old, corrupt 
bureaucracy was typical of the extraordinary political and social imagination 
that is changing Venezuela peacefully. This is his “Bolivarian revolution”, 
which, at this stage, is not dissimilar to the post-war European social 
democracies.

Chavez, a former army major, was anxious to prove he was not yet another 
military “strongman”. He promised that his every move would be subject to the 
will of the people. In his first year as president in 1999, he held an 
unprecedented number of votes: a referendum on whether or not people wanted a 
new constituent assembly; elections for the assembly; a second referendum 
ratifying the new constitution — 71 per cent of the people approved each of the 
396 articles that gave Mavis and Celedonia and Ana Lucia, and their children 
and grandchildren, unheard-of freedoms, such as Article 123, which for the 
first time recognised the human rights of mixed-race and black people, of whom 
Chavez is one.

“The indigenous peoples,” it says, “have the right to maintain their own 
economic practices, based on reciprocity, solidarity and exchange ... and to 
define their priorities ... “ The little red book of the Venezuelan 
constitution became a bestseller on the streets. Nora Hernandez, a community 
worker in Petare barrio, took me to her local state-run supermarket, which is 
funded entirely by oil revenue and where prices are up to half those in the 
commercial chains. Proudly, she showed me articles of the constitution written 
on the backs of soap-powder packets. “We can never go back,” she said.

In La Vega barrio, I listened to a nurse, Mariella Machado, a big round black 
woman of 45 with a wonderfully wicked laugh, stand and speak at an urban land 
council on subjects ranging from homelessness to the Iraq war. That day, they 
were launching Mision Madres de Barrio, a programme aimed specifically at 
poverty among single mothers.

Under the constitution, women have the right to be paid as carers, and can 
borrow from a special women’s bank. From next month, the poorest housewives 
will get about 120 pounds a month. It is not surprising that Chavez has now won 
eight elections and referendums in eight years, each time increasing his 
majority, a world record. He is the most popular head of state in the western 
hemisphere, probably in the world. That is why he survived, amazingly, a 
Washington-backed coup in 2002.

Mariella and Celedonia and Nora and hundreds of thousands of others came down 
from the barrios and demanded that the army remain loyal. “The people rescued 
me,” Chavez told me. “They did it with all the media against me, preventing 
even the basic facts of what had happened. For popular democracy in heroic 
action, I suggest you need look no further.”

The venomous attacks on Chavez, who is due in London, have begun and resemble 
uncannily those of the privately owned Venezuelan television and press, which 
called for the elected government to be overthrown. Fact-deprived attacks on 
Chavez in “The Times” and the “Financial Times” this week, each with that 
peculiar malice reserved for true dissenters from Thatcher’s and Blair’s one 
true way, follow a travesty of journalism on Channel 4 News last month, which 
effectively accused the Venezuelan president of plotting to make nuclear 
weapons with Iran, an absurd fantasy.

The reporter sneered at policies to eradicate poverty and presented Chavez as a 
sinister buffoon, while Donald Rumsfeld was allowed to liken him to Hitler, 
unchallenged. In contrast, Tony Blair, a patrician with no equivalent 
democratic record, having been elected by a fifth of those eligible to vote and 
having caused the violent death of tens of thousands of Iraqis, is allowed to 
continue spinning his truly absurd political survival tale.

Chavez is, of course, a threat, especially to the United States. Like the 
Sandinistas in Nicaragua, who based their revolution on the English 
co-operative moment, and the moderate Allende in Chile, he offers the threat of 
an alternative way of developing a decent society: in other words, the threat 
of a good example in a continent where the majority of humanity has long 
suffered a Washington-designed peonage.

In the US media in the 1980s, the “threat” of tiny Nicaragua was seriously 
debated until it was crushed. Venezuela is clearly being “softened up” for 
something similar. A US army publication, Doctrine for Asymmetric War against 
Venezuela, describes Chavez and the Bolivarian revolution as the “largest 
threat since the Soviet Union and Communism”.

When I said to Chavez that the US historically had had its way in Latin 
America, he replied: “Yes, and my assassination would come as no surprise. But 
the empire is in trouble, and the people of Venezuela will resist an attack. We 
ask only for the support of all true democrats.” —Dawn/Guardian Service

                
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low  PC-to-Phone call rates.
_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to