Comrade Taimur,
   
  The following article is one that I copied for your input.  It is from a 
trotskyist site so that obviously is an element for caution.
   
  I present this article because it does bring out some points that are very 
relevant for questioning the position of Bhutto.  Since I am not in any way a 
citizen of Pakistan or affiliated with any groups there I do not pretend to 
know first hand the information that is necessary to develop an informed 
position.
   
  You, obviously are a member of a communist organization in Pakistan, which is 
why I defer to you on this matter.
   
  Although I have not focused my attention on this situation in Pakistan as I 
have other projects that occupy more time than I actually have, in honesty, 
many of the points brought out by this article do sum up my views on Bhutto as 
basically being in line with US capitalism while in opposition to Musharraf.
   
  This article was written September 2007 so it is very recent.
   
  Fraternaly
   
  Mark Scott
   
   
  What lies behind recent developments in Pakistan? Why did the Supreme Court 
lift the ban on Nawaz Sharif returning to Pakistan for him only to expelled by 
the Military as soon as he set foot on Pakistani soil? Why are Benazir Bhutto 
(in exile) and the military dictator Musharraf trying to reach a deal over how 
the country is to be governed in the next period? None of these manoeuvres can 
be understood without looking at the terrible nightmare that the Pakistani 
people have been thrown into. 
   
  The Pakistani economy is in tatters, the social fabric of the country is 
tearing apart, civil war is raging from Waziristan to Balouchistan, Karachi is 
in the throes of a possible ethnic and nationalist conflagration. Yet again, 
national oppression has become a festering wound, the state has lost its sting, 
the opposition leadership has capitulated and tried to kill the vigour of mass 
resistance, culture has been vandalized, human relations have deteriorated, 
cynicism dominates the intelligentsia, obscurantism with its open fangs 
threatens society, liberalism exudes a sickening vulgarity, and economic and 
social oppression are agonizing human life. 
   
  The story of Pakistani capitalism is over. And in spite of the present 
apparent impasse, the masses will rise beyond all imagination of the 
reactionary Pakistani media. It is a universal law of class society that the 
waves of class struggle may ebb, but they always come back with a vengeance and 
enter the arena of history as the masses attempt to take their destiny into 
their own hands. 
  Aggravating Turmoil  The quasi-military dictatorship in Pakistan has been 
lurching from one crisis to another ever since it took power through a 
bloodless coup in October 1999. However, the turbulence and convulsions since 
then have been aggravated so much that the regime is now teetering on the 
brink. The recent episode of the return of Nawaz Sharif, twice former prime 
minister, and his subsequent deportation to Saudi Arabia adds to the string of 
tumultuous events which are shaking the regime more and more. 
   
  Nawaz Sharif is a business tycoon and was brought into politics by the 
vicious Zia dictatorship in the 1980s in reward for the massive wealth showered 
upon the generals by his entrepreneur family who had enriched themselves with 
the loot they had accumulated under the despotic military rule. He is a 
right-wing politician who was overthrown by the military when he tried to 
over-assert his power, which in itself was at the mercy of the generals. His 
political base mainly comprises of businessmen and shopkeepers. After his 
overthrow ‑ and safe exit to Saudi Arabia negotiated with Musharraf by 
the Royal family under influence of Bill Clinton ‑ he was fast dwindling 
into political oblivion. 
  Ironically, it was Benazir Bhutto who brought him back into the limelight by 
pestering reluctant PPP activists to portray him as a champion of democracy. 
Benazir's main motive in forming an alliance with Sharif's party was to stop 
any left radicalisation within the PPP and present herself to the "world 
community" as a pro-market politician. 
   
  But then the Americans forced Benazir towards conciliation with Musharraf, 
and so she had to break with Sharif. Meanwhile, the Islamic nationalist and 
other right-wing parties allied themselves with Sharif and they formed the APDM 
(All Parties Democratic Movement) in London. All this further bloated Sharif's 
megalomaniac tendencies to which he has always been vulnerable. 
   
  He had the notion that on his return millions would pour onto the streets and 
the regime would crumble and abdicate power in his favour. This was not to be. 
Most of his party leaders, mainly capitalists and landlords, had switched sides 
as soon as he was ousted from power. They had joined yet another version of the 
Muslim League formed by the army, in line with the whole of the political 
history of Muslim Leagues propped up under every military dictatorship. 
   
  In spite of the fact that there was no mass turnout or paralysis of society, 
the response of the Musharraf regime was equally desperate and nervous. The 
massive state operation carried out on the return of Sharif exposed the fragile 
nature and the rapidly dwindling confidence of the Musharraf regime. Sharif is 
back in the comfort of his personal luxurious palace in Saudi Arabia but the 
convulsions continue to rattle the state and society in Pakistan. 
   
  Trotsky in 1932 wrote on the February 1917 regime in Russia, "The government 
with its inattention to the masses, its light-minded indifference to their 
needs, its impudent phrase-mongering in answer to the protests and cries of 
despair was raising up everybody against it. It seemed as though the government 
was deliberately seeking a conflict." This description graphically illustrates 
the state of the present crisis ridden regime in Pakistan. 
   
  The crisis is so intense today that never in the history of Pakistan has 
anyone seen such confusion, perplexity and bewilderment in society. The media, 
pseudo-intellectuals and analysts are adding to this confusion. They are 
raising all kinds of secondary issues, such as the judicial crisis, the Red 
Mosque, the Musharraf-Benazir deal, the return and re-exile of Nawaz Sharif, 
the uniform of the President, frivolous statements by American diplomats and 
presenting them as key issues in the minds of the masses. But the real aim of 
these analysts, together with all these scandals, is to hide the real economic 
and social turmoil ravaging society. The speed and intensity of these explosive 
events is such that while one incident is taking place the next one comes 
rolling over it. The speed of events is actually the symbol of the intensifying 
socio-economic malaise that is engulfing society. 
  A failed state  The Pakistani ruling class has been a failure ever since its 
inception. Today they are even worse than they were in 1947. An important 
contradiction of this epoch is that the ruling classes of underdeveloped 
countries have to bear the brunt of the crimes and sins of world imperialism. 
In fact it is the basic law of this system. Under the cruel burden of 
imperialism those states fail that cannot accumulate a large amount of finance 
capital because monopoly capitalism does not allow them any concessions in this 
cutthroat competitive globalisation. The Pakistani state is facing the same 
dilemma. 
   
  Where we see explosive contradictions in the state and in the politics of the 
ruling classes, there we also see changing coalitions, compromises and 
alliances at every juncture. Who is not in a deal with someone or other? But 
behind every "deal" there are financial interests. 
   
  Behind the Islamisation of the Mullahs there is the need for protection of 
black money. Without the patronage of the state agencies, the Mullahs could 
never have dreamt of the number of votes they got in the 2002 general 
elections. 
   
  This criminal network was established by the CIA to finance the Afghan jihad 
of the 1980s. 
  Every "deal" of the MQM is aimed at guaranteeing the protection of its 
extortionist gangs in Karachi and elsewhere. The PML(N) represents those big 
shopkeepers, businessmen and industrialists who could not get a share of the 
looting of the last few years. Nationalist leaders now want their own 
"independent" small capitalist markets with support from the USA. But why would 
the Pakistan Army give them these markets when it is having a free 
roller-coaster ride of its own? 
   
  So long as the army was not so deeply involved in finance capital, the story 
was different. But after the Zia-ul-Haq regime the penetration of finance 
capital within the Military has itself become a source of discord within the 
army. This process has been responsible for the internal decay and weakening of 
military discipline. To fulfil the ever-increasing demands of the exploiters 
and overcome the deficits in State expenditure they have to rely on the World 
Bank and the IMF. These imperialist institutions have accumulated this wealth 
by plundering and exploiting the masses of Africa, Asia and Latin America. 
Therefore, when these institutions give loans or "aid" to local brokers they 
give them on brutal terms and conditions. This makes the local elite 
subservient to imperialism. In Pakistan most of the plundering is carried out 
by imperialist monopolies and international financial institutions in 
connivance with the Military and the elite. 
   
  Capitalism has reached such a point where it cannot justify its own existence 
any more. This should be understood not from a commercial but a social point of 
view. It has to resort to vicious exploitation and unprecedented oppression. 
   
  The condition of the Pakistani capitalist economy is a miserable one. The 
rise in the growth rate actually ends up in lowering the living standards of 
the vast majority of the impoverished populace. Due to the intensity of this 
crisis deceit, corruption, fraud and erosion of social values and life are 
endemic. The aggravation of lumpen tendencies with the high rise in crime, 
bloodshed, insecurity and plundering due to this corruption and social 
degeneration, has taken urban and rural life hostage. 
   
  The sharp rise in poverty, disease, unemployment, illiteracy, price hikes and 
filth, has rapidly worsened the conditions of the masses which is resulting in 
cultural suffocation, obscurantism, alienation and frustration. The main reason 
for this apathy is that no political party or leadership or tendency on the 
political horizon is offering any real solution or a way out to end this 
misery. 
   
  The greed of the ruling classes has reached such an intensity that they are 
plundering the wealth of the country on an unprecedented level, even for a 
corrupt country like Pakistan. In the last three years the section of the 
ruling class in power has had loans worth Rs.33 billion waived and at the same 
time it has received subsidies to the tune of Rs.24 billion. This blatant theft 
of Rs.57 billion was to the benefit of just 1122 feudal lords, industrialists 
and businessmen. Among them 11 industrialists alone plundered Rs12.3 billion in 
2003 from the State. 
   
  There is a major balance of payments crisis with the highest ever deficits in 
trade as well as in the current account. Foreign debt in the year 2004 was 
$35.47 billion. It has now reached $40.172 billion. This has happened in spite 
of the record home remittances by overseas Pakistanis of $6.5 billion and a 
record overseas direct investment of $64 billion. 
   
  Currently 78 percent of the population lives on less then $2 a day. 82 
percent of the people are forced into non-scientific modes of medication. 68 
percent of diseases are due to poverty. 54 percent of children cannot go to 
school. Expenditure on health as a percentage of GNP was 0.7% in 1998-99. In 
2005-06, the expenditure on health was a paltry 0.5% of GNP ‑ the lowest 
in the world. In 1999-2000 expenditure on education was 2% of GNP. In 2004-05 
it was as low as one percent. Thus misery and suffering stalk the land. 
   
  Privatisation, downsizing, liberalization, restructuring, the contract 
system, forced redundancies and other such savage policies are brutally 
crushing the working class. This social chaos, corruption and looting is also 
creating huge fissures and contradictions within the State institutions. The 
Pakistani ruling class due to its historical belatedness, technological and 
financial dearth, has difficulties in surviving in the present era of 
globalisation. In this process the ruling class is so dependent upon the state 
institutions, especially the army, that after the imperialist monopolies the 
Pakistani army has become the largest financial and industrial entrepreneur in 
the country. Now more than 25% of the economy is the property of the military 
top brass. 
   
  The explosion of internal crises in the various institutions of the State, 
including the army, is basically the reflection of the conflict between 
different financial interests. On the surface it appears as a conflict between 
Islamic fundamentalists and the Liberal factions, but in fact it is a battle 
for the booty that comes from looting. Both the liberal and fundamentalist 
political tendencies rest on the same economic base: capitalism! 

       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to