Because of the position it occupies in production and society the proletariat 
must act as the leader and organizer of all the oppressed and exploited in the 
struggle for communism.  In 1846 Marx wrote:

"We do not regard communism as a STATE OF AFFAIRS that has to be brought about; 
nor as an ideal to which reality must conform.  By communism we mean an ACTUAL 
movement that will sweep away the present state of affairs.  The conditions for 
that movement arise out of already existing premises."  (Marx's emphasis)

By these postulates Marx meant: the growth of the working-class, both in 
numbers and in class consciousness; large-scale industry and socialized 
production developed by capitalism.  But private property in the means of 
production - which is the very foundation of capitalism - hampers and fetter 
the further development of the productive forces.  The proletariat alone can 
break those fetters; after it has established its dictatorship the proletariat 
must smash the machinery of the bourgeois state; it must defind its own state 
power in civil war and crush the opposition of the bourgeoisie; it must take 
over large-scale industry and transform the means of production on socialist 
lines, and, on the ruins of capitalism and using the material left over from 
capitalism, give the widest possible development to socialist production with 
all possible speed.  The proletariat assumes the leadership of the 
non-proletarian sections of society that are oppressed and
exploited by by capitalism.  Under the guidance of the industrial proletariat, 
and with the help of its dictatorship, a complete transformation of production 
takes place and the small producers are turned into members of socialist 
society.  The proletariat thereby creates a new material basis for human 
relationships.  By means of the class struggle, and with the help of its 
dictatorship, it abolishes classes and achieves a classless society.  Such is 
the historical mission of the proletariat throughout the whole world.

The destruction of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie is more than just 
"combat" but is in fact a "science of society" that must transform capitalist 
society into socialist society which can only be accomplished by establishing 
the dictatorship of the proletariat as it attempts to use the infrastructure 
and means of production to develop socialism.  This must be a transitory phase 
in which the proletariat uses it power and authority - its dictatorship - over 
the remaining elements of capitalist society to accomplish this transformation 
as it must incorporate into this transformation remaining elements of the 
bourgeoisie until the transformation is complete through training workers and 
the eradication of bourgeois ideological influence.  Only then can it be 
possible to attain classless society or communism.  To accomplish the "quality" 
of communism it most certainly implies that one must develop and improve the 
"science of society" as we know that
Lenin did.

You understand nothing about dialectical materialism obviously.

A Few words should be said in conclusion as to how to study the works of 
Lenin.  It should be borne in mind that Lenin was a leader of the proletariat.  
A study of his literary works must be closely combined with a study of his 
activities and of the conditions in which he worked.  Only in this way will the 
works of Lenin be properly understood and appreciated.  This study, however, 
must be linked with the present-day struggle of the proletariat.  However, I 
will reserve this part for another post since I was digressed into a defense of 
Lenin and dialectical materialism.  In this defense I have very extensively 
used V. Adoratsky to refute the notion that Marxism is dead as far as it 
relates to the "ancient writings" of great Marxists and that they somehow have 
no relativity in our contemporary capitalist society and that these "ancient 
writings" also somehow pose a contradiction in the continuance of the class 
struggle which would require an "either
or" choice between responsibility to the working-class and the relevance of 
these "ancient writings".

Fraternally

Mark Scott




      
_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to