--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: manisha sethi <manisha.se...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:27 AM
Subject: Swami Aseemanand’s Confessions: Its time for an apology--JTSA
release
To:




*Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Association*

9th January 2010

*Swami Aseemanand’s Confessions: Its time for an apology*


Swami Aseemanand’s confession before the metropolitan magistrate of Tees
Hazari Court has finally put the seal of legal validity over what had been
circulating for months now, since the surfacing of the audio tapes seized
from Dayanand Pande’s laptop. That Hindutva groups had been plotting and
executing a series of bomb blasts across the country—including Malegaon
(2006 and 08), Samjhauta Express (2007), Ajmer Sharif (2007) and Mecca
Masjid (2007).

For the past several years however, dozens of Muslim youth have been picked
up, detained, tortured, chargesheeted for these blasts—with clearly no
evidence, except for custodial confessions (which unlike Swami’s confessions
have no legal value). Report after report has proved that the Maharashtra
and Andhra police willfully refused to pursue the Hindutva angle preferring
to engage in communal witch-hunt—or as in the case of Nanded blast—where the
evidence was so glaring as to be unimpeachable—weakening the prosecution of
these elements.

What is striking today is not the revelation contained in Aseemanand’s
confessions but that it should have taken the country’s premier and pampered
security agencies this long—four years after the Malegaon serial blasts, and
even longer since the explosions elsewhere in Maharashtra—to unravel the
Hindutva terror networks. Especially so, when Maharshtra ATS chief Hemant
Karkare had, as far back as 2008, communicated to the Hyderabad Police the
sensational claim by Col. Purohit that he had procured RDX from an army
inventory when he was posted in Jammu and Kashmir in 2006. While the
Hyderabad Police having conveniently arrested over 70 Muslim youth, tortured
them at private farmhouses and extracted confessions, refused even to seek
Puroshit’s custody; the Haryana ATS investigating the Samjhauta Express
blast questioned Dayanand Pande but then pleaded that the trail had turned
cold, thus washing its hands off. The use of RDX in the Samjhauta blast was
touted as proof enough of Pakistani involvement in the Samjhauta blast; the
crucial piece of evidence, the suitcase carrying the bomb was traced to
Kothari Market in Indore, but the Haryana ATS, possibly under pressure or
simply incredulous about the possibility of Hindutva terror appeared
paralyzed.

*Amnesia about Narco-Analysis?*

What is one to make of the reports of the Narco-analysis tests conducted on
SIMI activists, including Safdar Nagori his brother Kamruddin Nagori and
Amil Parvez in April 2008, which claimed expediently that SIMI activists “had
helped carry out the Mumbai train bombings of July 11, 2006 and the
Samjhauta Express blasts of January 2007...with the help of Pakistani
nationals who had come from across the border.” *India Today* magazine had
proudly claimed in an ‘exclusive’ that the Narco-tests revealed “SIMI’s
direct links with not only the Mumbai train bombings which killed over 200
persons but also links with the Samjhauta Express blast of February 2007
which killed 68 persons.” The reports of the Narco test on Nagori claimed
that he had revealed that “some persons from Pakistan” had purchased the
suitcase cover at Kataria market, Indore, while a SIMI activist “helped them
to get the suitcase cover stitched”. Nagori is said to have named Abdul
Razak and Misbah-ul-Islam of Kolkata as key people who provided crucial
support to SIMI’s Indore unit in executing the Samjhauta train blast.

As for the Malegaon blasts, Nagori is said to have ‘admitted’ during the
Narco test that some Muslim members were involved and he was aware of it;
and he attributed the Hyderabad blast to one Nasir—who according to Nagori
disliked the owner of the Gokul Chat stall—who was arrested a few months’
prior to Nagori’s arrest.

Other important information revealed in the exclusive story is the Nagori
claim that “most of the SIMI activists knew about other bomb conspiracies
across the country” and the presence of sleeper cells in Hubli.  (Sandeep
Unnithan, *India** Today*, 19 September 2008)

So why did Nagori decide—even if in a drugged state—to take credit for the
blasts that have now been proven to be the handiwork of Sangh offshoots? To
boost SIMI’s sagging image? Or maybe to score brownie points over rival
factions within SIMI?

Or perhaps, as several scientists, jurists and civil rights activists have
been pointing out, Narco-analysis not only robs the suspect’s rights and
dignity—amounting to third degree—but is also highly unscientific, dubious
and undependable as evidence in investigations. It is entirely possible for
the investigator to induce, communicate his/ her ideas and thoughts to the
suspect, thereby eliciting a response favoured by the investigator and the
police theory—whatever it happens to be at the moment.

*Media or Hand Maiden of the Police?*

What *India Today* was trying to disguise as a scoop was the result not of
any painstaking investigation, but the patronage of security agencies. This
is sadly becoming too routine in supposedly investigative stories about
blasts and terror strikes: security agencies pass on dossiers and reports
such as the Narco tests to favoured journalists, who dutifully reproduce the
police version. The public naming of individuals and groups as suspects—with
little credible evidence—is usually a prelude to detentions, arrests and
torture of ‘suspects’. No doubt, claims that SIMI members in Maharashtra
were in the know of the bomb conspiracy then afford greater freedom to the
police to launch manhunts for former SIMI members (even when the
organization was still not banned) as co-conspirators. Mass arrests
following Mecca Masjid blasts were accompanied by stories which implicated
local youth from Muslim-dominated localities such as Moosaram Bagh (“Behind
the Mecca Masjid Bombing: Communal Violence, Organised Crime and Global
Jihad Intersect in Andhra Pradesh’s Capital” by Praveen Swami, *Frontline*,
May 23, 2007).  Such stories lent a veneer of legitimacy to the subversion
of due processes of law—where the hype surrounding the threats of Islamic
terrorism justifies the shortcut methods of investigation—namely illegal
detentions, torture, custodial confessions, narco-tests and the like.



On October 11, 2007 the Union Home Ministry claimed that the Ajmer Sharif
blast was the handiwork of the Lashkar-e-Toiba, which was opposed to Sufi
Islam, whose prime symbol was the Ajmer Sharif dargah. And the very next
day, Praveen Swami served up “The War against Popular Islam” (The Hindu,
October 12, 2007), wherein he claimed that the bombing of the Ajmer
dargah—as well as blasts at Mecca Masjid and Sufi shrine in Malegaon—reflect
a “less-understood project: the war of Islamist neoconservatives against the
syncretic traditions and beliefs that characterise popular Islam in India,
Pakistan and Bangladesh.” It turns out now that Swami’s profound
understanding has been turned on its head: it was not rabid Islam’s war
against popular Islam but Hindutva’s revenge on the inherent syncreticism of
India. Aseemanand is said to have told the magistrate: “Since Hindus throng
the Ajmer Sharif Dargah we thought a bomb blast in Ajmer would deter Hindus
from going there.” (in *Tehelka*, 15 January, 2011). Again screaming
headlines about HUJI link created an atmosphere in which the Rajasthan SIT
could detain a dozen Imams, maulvis and madrasa teachers, without producing
the suspects in court, plucking them from their native places and bringing
them to Ajmer for interrogation without even bothering to obtain transit
remands.



More recently, the Varanasi blast occasioned yet another rash of stories
based on ‘sources’ in the Indian intelligence agencies about Indian
Mujahideen men on the run, in hideouts abroad, but whose associates still
live in places as predictable as Azamgarh and Bhatkal. (For a fairly
standard story see, “Indian Mujahudeen: The Hunt Continues” by Vicky
Nanjapa. *
http://vickynanjapa.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/indian-mujahideen-the-hunt-continues
*/)



Gear up for more arrests, shall we?



*An apology? And some compensation? *

Though the Mecca Masjid blast case was transferred to the CBI, the Hyderabad
Police registered three cases related to conspiracies in order to retain
control over the investigations and indeed to push for its line of
investigation based on forced confessions extracted under torture. This is
clear demonstration of the high stakes Special Investigation Teams (SITs)
and Special Cells attach to cases such as bomb blasts and terror attacks:
terror investigations are lucrative means of earning quick medals,
promotions and awards—as long as scapegoats (read Muslim youth) can be
produced and paraded as masterminds, conspirators and accomplices.

*The Home Ministry must release a White Paper on the total number of those
arrested and in jail currently for the blasts now in every single the blasts
named by Swami Aseemanand as the handiwork of his organization and
associates. Those still languishing in prisons must be released without any
further delay.*

*Those whose lives have been destroyed, those psychologically scarred and
socially stigmatized by these false charges and imprisonment deserve surely
a public apology, from the state governments as well as the Home
Ministry.*The former Home Minister Shivraj Patil had expressed his
satisfaction at the
direction of the Ajmer bomb probe—at the time when maulavis and madrasa
teachers were being picked up—and in 2009, P. Chidambaram had pleaded that
the investigations in the Mecca Masjid blast case had reached a dead end
with the death of the mastermind of the blast, Shahid Bilal (the same Bilal
whose house appeared prominently in Praveen Swami’s article). More recently,
when a Hindutva angle was suggested by the Maharashtra ATS in the Pune
Bakery blast, The Maharashtra Home Minister, RR Patil threatened action
against the ATS Chief.

Even the exceedingly low levels of political propriety in our country can be
no excuse for not tendering an apology to the victims of the witch-hunt.* *The
Andhra Chief Minister has announced grandly on the floor of the state
assembly that he would tender an apology if it was proved that Muslim youth
had been deliberately harassed by the police in the aftermath of the Mecca
Masjid blasts. The AP Chief Minister would do well to read the reports of
the National Minorities Commission and the AP Minorities Commission, both of
which laid bare the gratuitous violence committed by the Hyderabad police on
suspects. The CM appears to be waiting for the report of the Justice
Bhaskara Rao Commission before offering an apology (newspaper reports on 17
Dec 2010). Except that he forgot that the Commission was appointed to look
into the police firing after the Mecca Masjid blasts and *not* into
accusations of torture and illegal detention—and the Commission already
submitted its report to the CM three months ago, in October 2010!

While we need to be vigilant that the investigations are now not derailed by
prejudice of security agencies and state governments; the issue of
compensation to those unjustifiably arrested and tortured needs to be
addressed urgently. *Dr. Haneef’s case in Australia—where the Australian
government apologised and paid undisclosed large sums of money as
compensation for wrongful terror accusations and detention—should serve as a
model for us here. *The Andhra Pradesh Government’s offer of rehabilitation
package of Rs 30,000 –Rs 80,000 *as loans* (!) to those  who suffered
arrests and torture can only add insult to the already inflicted injury
(“Andhra’s ‘Healing Touch’ to ‘innocent’ Muslims”, Indian Express, 14 Nov
2008). Just for the sake of record, even these loans have not materialsed.
On the other hand, the state government is contesting the damages of Rs 20
lakhs each being claimed by the victims in the Hyderabad City Civil Court.

Finally, all those who colluded and covered up these sham investigations
need to be brought to justice: those in the intelligence agencies, officers
of the police and security agencies, political bosses *et al*.  The
Hyderabad Joint Commissioner of Police (Administration) Harish Gupta—who
presided over the Mecca Masjid custodial confessions, torture and
narco-analysis tests—must be held accountable. As must be each and every
police officer who participated in this charade of investigation; in this
large scale violation of the rights of the accused by subjecting them to
brutal torture, and in doing so, undermined their own office. Police
officers must be charged and tried for their criminal acts of violence
against the youth—whom they knew to be innocent—as well as gross dereliction
of duties for deliberately building their investigations on falsehoods in so
serious a crime as bomb blasts.

We shouldn’t have had to wait for a change of Swami Aseemanand’s heart to
reach this far.

Sd/-

Manisha Sethi, Sanghamitra Misra, Ahmed Sohaib, Adil Mehdi, Tanweer fazal,
Ghazi Shahnawaz, Arshad Alam, Farah Farooqi, Azra Razak, Ambarien Al Qadar,
Anwar Alam, Shakeb Ahmed, Haris ul Haq for JTSA.

www.teacherssolidarity.org

_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to