I was sent this by the same group.

Klo


                 BULLETIN FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ACTION 
                              CENTER (IAC)
                         JANUARY 17, 2001, 5 PM
                                    
Status of January 20 demonstration and our groundbreaking lawsuit 
for free speech

Attorneys representing the January 20 Counter-Inaugural protesters 
are awaiting word as to when a hearing will be scheduled on their 
motion for a preliminary injunction against the "security plan" devised 
by the Secret Service, DC police and other agencies for the January 
20 inauguration and the demonstration that is scheduled to take 
place at the same time.  

The lawsuit--"International Action Center, et al, vs. the United 
States of America"--is requesting a preliminary injunction and was 
filed Tuesday, January 16 at 2:30 pm in the U.S. District Court.  
The lawsuit is filed on behalf of the IAC, JAM and other protest 
groups.

The Complaint, the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and the 
attached Memorandum can be found at the web site of the 
Partnership for Civil Justice: www.justiceonline.org (a link to this 
page can be found on the IAC web site: www.iacenter.org).  The 
lawsuit seeks to strike down the announced "security plan" as 
constitutionally invalid for a number of reasons (see below).  (For 
the full lawsuit, see www.justiceonline.org.) 

We are confident that we will prevail in this historic lawsuit.  We 
should remember that we had to first overcome the obstinacy of the 
police, who did not want to grant us the permit for Freedom Plaza in 
the first place.  Our legal pressure, the mass mobilization of the 
people and intense media scrutiny forced the government to 
acknowledge that we indeed do have the legal right to these permits. 
 The lawsuit seeks to strike down other obstacles and impediments 
placed in the path of our being able to conduct a massive legal, 
lawful and orderly demonstration.

We have already won a tremendous victory.  The world media and 
as a consequence people throughout the world now know that the 
struggle for free speech is alive and well in Washington DC.  
Furthermore, a bright light now shines on the Secret Service, the 
DC police and the Bush administration.  

Although we do not yet know the outcome of the lawsuit, we do 
know that people from all over the United States are paying 
attention to this struggle and that we will have the active involvement 
of many thousands and the active support of millions who agree with 
the demonstration but may not be able to personally attend the 
activity.

It is of great importance that thousands of people from around the 
country are coming to Washington DC on January 20, the first day 
of the administration of George W. Bush as the 43rd President, to 
demonstrate opposition to his conservative and right-wing policies.  
They include Civil Rights organizations, workers' unions, immigrant 
rights organizations, women's groups, the lesbian/gay/bi/trans 
movement, and those opposed to U.S. military intervention in the 
Third World have coalesced into a new progressive movement for 
social change.  

It is an irony of history that George W. Bush--an unelected, right-
wing politician--upon assuming the presidency, will act as a catalyst-
-not for a new conservative era--but on the contrary, for the rebirth 
of a progressive movement for social justice.  

The January 20 counter-inaugural demonstration is not merely a 
single event, but a step in the process towards the rebirth of a new 
movement for social justice.  

Bush wants to put Confederates in the cabinet, he wants to roll back 
workers' rights, affirmative action, Roe v Wade and women's 
reproductive rights.  He wants to give trillions in tax breaks to the 
already wealthy, he wants to build the National Missile Defense, 
which is a gigantic subsidy to the military-industrial complex.

George W. Bush's real constituency is Big Oil, the big 
pharmaceuticals, the HMOs and the big war contractors.  If 
allowed, he will fleece the working and poor people in the U.S., for 
the benefit of the corporate elite.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE LAWSUIT

The lawsuit was filed by attorneys from the Partnership for Civil 
Justice and the National Lawyers Guild on behalf of those who plan 
to organize protests at the January 20 inauguration.

Our lawsuit specifically asserts that the government's current security 
plan for the January 20 inauguration is "constitutionally invalid."

While the National Parks Service was forced to grant us permits to 
rally at Freedom Plaza (14th St. and Pennsylvania Ave. NW), at the 
Justice Department (Pennsylvania Ave. between 9th and 10th St. 
NW), and at McPherson Square (15th and I St. NW), we believe 
that the Secret Service, Metropolitan police and other government 
agencies are using the issue of national security as a pretext to 
inhibit, violate and subvert our constitutionally-protected guarantees 
to free speech.

The lawsuit focuses on several issues, including these two:

(1)  Access to the inaugural parade route: The government has set 
up security check points through which all people entering the 
parade route will be filtered.  We believe that the system is 
established to discriminate against demonstrators who will be denied 
the access granted to George W. Bush's financial donors and right-
wing ideological supporters.  The police agencies have told the 
media that the check points are being established because of the 
demonstrators.  This clearly demonstrates that the check points are 
not "neutral" but are "content" based.  The check points are not 
really for security, but to restrain the rights of demonstrators to gain 
access to the parade route.  

(2)  "Unfettered discretion" by police agencies: The police agencies 
have been calculatingly vague about their rules and conduct 
regarding security, check points, what will be permitted and what 
will not.  Boundaries and parameters keep shifting, as do the 
explanations given to the public and to demonstrators by police 
authorities.  This policy of deliberate vagueness is an undisguised 
attempt to give police agencies "unfettered discretion" on January 20 
in regard to their behavior towards demonstrators.  On its face, this 
"unfettered discretion" is a violation of the demonstrators right to 
organize and prepare a peaceful and legal assembly for their 
demonstration.

The lawsuit was  filed in U.S. District Court at 2:30 pm on Tuesday, 
January 16.

We are in an emergency situation.  With only days before the 
scheduled inaugural event and our demonstration, it is necessary for 
the courts to take urgent action against the "constitutionally invalid" 
procedures of the police agencies.  

While we are confident that we will win a victory in the courts, we 
know that the power is in the people and that thousands and 
thousands of people will be coming to Washington at Freedom 
Plaza and elsewhere.  We are determined to demonstrate.  We will 
never surrender our first amendment rights.  Our movement will 
grow stronger and stronger in the coming months and years.

/30
International Action Center
39 West 14th Street, Room 206
New York, NY 10011
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.iacenter.org
CHECK OUT SITE 
   http://www.mumia2000.org
phone: 212 633-6646
fax:   212 633-2889
*To make a tax-deductible donation, 
go to 
  http://www.peoplesrightsfund.org



Reply via email to