---------- Forwarded message --------- From: FAIR <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 6:32 PM Subject: ACTION ALERT: What Can 'Now Be Told' by NYT About Pentagon Papers Isn't Actually True To: <[email protected]>
<https://us20.campaign-archive.com/?e=9e9cb3e1ce&u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=dfa39aa25d> [image: FAIR] View article on FAIR's website <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=4124d40875&e=9e9cb3e1ce> ACTION ALERT: What Can 'Now Be Told' by NYT About Pentagon Papers Isn't Actually True Jim Naureckas <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=a84a2634a7&e=9e9cb3e1ce> [image: NYT: Now It Can Be Told: How Neil Sheehan Got the Pentagon Papers] *The most important claim in the New York Times' revisionist history of the Pentagon Papers (1/7/21 <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=e54a728d72&e=9e9cb3e1ce>) is demonstrably false.* The day *New York Times* journalist Neil Sheehan died, the *Times* ran a story (1/7/21 <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=f6d150d298&e=9e9cb3e1ce>) with the headline, "Now It Can Be Told: How Neil Sheehan Got the Pentagon Papers." It purports to be the true story of how the paper obtained the Defense Department's classified history of the Vietnam War that had been secretly photocopied by former Pentagon analyst Daniel Ellsberg <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=d0e5c05b36&e=9e9cb3e1ce>. Here's what Sheehan told reporter Janny Scott in 2015, on the condition that it could not be published until after Sheehan's death: Contrary to what is generally believed, Mr. Ellsberg never “gave” the papers to the *Times*, Mr. Sheehan emphatically said. Mr. Ellsberg told Mr. Sheehan that he could read them but not make copies. So Mr. Sheehan smuggled the papers out of the apartment in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where Mr. Ellsberg had stashed them; then he copied them illicitly, just as Mr. Ellsberg had done, and took them to the *Times*. In Sheehan's telling, Ellsberg is a fearful neurotic, so afraid of going to prison that he makes foolish mistakes that could lead to getting caught—and so Sheehan had to lie to his source and make his own copy, because he was determined that, as he put it, "this material is never again going in a government safe.” When the papers are published and Ellsberg discovers the ruse, Sheehan has Ellsberg say, “So you stole it, like I did.” To which Sheehan supposedly replied: No, Dan, I didn’t steal it.... And neither did you. Those papers are the property of the people of the United States. They paid for them with their national treasure and the blood of their sons, and they have a right to it. As you can probably tell from that dialogue, Sheehan made himself very much the hero of the story, which is perhaps why he wanted it published only after he was no longer around to be contradicted. There was nothing stopping Scott, though, from calling Ellsberg, who is still quite alive, and asking him for his reaction to Sheehan's account. She did not do so, but Daniel's son Robert Ellsberg provided that missing piece in a response to the story on *Twitter* (1/10/21 <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=410f8449ea&e=9e9cb3e1ce> ). Robert points out that his father's actions were not those of someone who feared prison; when he was arraigned, he asked <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=97c933f24c&e=9e9cb3e1ce> reporters, “Would not you go to prison to help end this war?” Rather, Daniel Ellsberg was afraid that he wouldn't be able to get out the secrets he was risking prison to expose. [image: AM Rosenthal congratulating New York Times staffers on the publication of the Pentagon Papers] *The New York Times online story (1/7/21 <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=8a60d7211d&e=9e9cb3e1ce>) on how the Pentagon Papers were published has a photograph of Times managing editor A.M. Rosenthal and other staffers reading the published document in the paper, and another photo (above) of Rosenthal congratulating Neil Sheehan and other staffers—but no image of Daniel Ellsberg, the whistleblower who was actually responsible for bringing the Pentagon Papers to the public.* Daniel has explained—notably in his 2002 memoir *Secrets* <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=6e6e70f1f3&e=9e9cb3e1ce>—that he would have given a copy of the Pentagon Papers to Sheehan immediately if only Sheehan had told him that the *Times* was seriously interested in publishing them. Which was true, but for reasons that aren't very clear in Sheehan's account, the reporter was unwilling to tell Ellsberg that. ("He feared that Mr. Ellsberg’s reaction might inadvertently tip the government off," is the explanation proffered.) As Robert notes, this meant that Daniel had to keep looking for another publisher—increasing and not decreasing the chances that the government might learn about and seize the copied papers. What Daniel Ellsberg remembers telling Sheehan when he found out about the *Times*' secret copy is, "You did what I did”—not, “So you stole it, like I did.” As Robert writes, "My father never considered that he had stolen anything"—and didn't need a reminder from Sheehan that the papers belonged to the American people. Of course, it's impossible to say which of two versions of a conversation that occurred between two people is correct—even if one version has the strong whiff of something that one person wishes they had said. But there is an important part of the *Times* story that is definitely false, and requires correction—because it's contradicted later in the same story. That's when the story reads, "Contrary to what is generally believed, Mr. Ellsberg never 'gave' the papers to the *Times*." In fact, Ellsberg *did* give the papers to Sheehan, as the story gets around to revealing 38 paragraphs later: So he told Mr. Ellsberg that he now needed the documents, not just his notes.... This time, when Mr. Sheehan asked, Mr. Ellsberg consented.... He arranged for Mr. Sheehan to pick up a complete copy of the historical study stowed in an Ellsberg family apartment in Manhattan. So the big revisionist revelation in the *New York Times* article turns out to be false. Rather, if you read to the end of this 2,800-word piece, you find that "what is generally believed"—is actually true. ACTION ALERT: Please tell the *New York Times* to set the historical record straight by correcting its story to note that Daniel Ellsberg did in fact give the Pentagon Papers to the *Times*. CONTACT: Letters: [email protected] Readers Center: Feedback <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=0752d15042&e=9e9cb3e1ce> *Twitter*: @NYTimes <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=793f288d69&e=9e9cb3e1ce> *Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your communication in the comments thread.* *Featured image: Daniel Ellsberg* Read more <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=e811afcf1a&e=9e9cb3e1ce> © 2020 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting Our mailing address is: FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING 124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201 New York, NY 10001 FAIR's Website <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=dbe3a7542d&e=9e9cb3e1ce> FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=e33b04f0a7&e=9e9cb3e1ce> . Follow us on Twitter <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=0734dde62d&e=9e9cb3e1ce> | Friend us on Facebook <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=b00adcc33b&e=9e9cb3e1ce> change your preferences <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/profile?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=e74f774479&e=9e9cb3e1ce> [image: Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp] <http://www.mailchimp.com/email-referral/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=referral_marketing&aid=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&afl=1> unsubscribe <https://fair.us20.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=e6457f9552de19bc603e65b9c&id=e74f774479&e=9e9cb3e1ce&c=dfa39aa25d> . -- Best regards, Andrew Stewart -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5566): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/5566 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/79693074/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
