that New Yorker article was extremely clever and yet to those who knew
Chomsky's work SO DAMN DISGUSTINGLY TRANSPARENT .... appearing to be a
"portrait" it was much harder to see through than the usual efforts to call
him a "self hating Jew" (on Israel-Palestine) or the more usual approach
--- to totally ignore him and ban him from many outlets for decades ....

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:01 AM Tristan Sloughter <t...@crashfast.com> wrote:

> A lengthy 2003 New Yorker smear job on Noam Chomsky headlined "The Devil's
> Accountant” — at the time when he was a rare and vocal critic of post-9/11
> U.S. foreign policy
>
>
> -
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8723): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/8723
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82896719/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to