The Baluchistan Imbroglio 

 

By Tariq Ali/Sidecar/January 19, 2024 

 

The level of ignorance in Western coverage of the border clashes between Iran 
and Pakistan should come as no surprise. Nor should the State Department 
declaration that Pakistan’s response was ‘proportionate’ – making for queasy 
comparisons with the ongoing mass slaughter being perpetrated by another US 
funded and armed entity not too far away. To get a clear picture of the latest 
strikes – Iran targeted the base of an armed-separatist group, the Jaish 
al-Adl, in the Pakistani province of Baluchistan on Tuesday; two days later, 
Pakistan unleashed a drone attack against Baluchi-militant ‘terrorist hideouts’ 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/17/world/asia/pakistan-iran-strike.html>  on 
the Iranian side of the border – we need to sweep away their web of lies and 
mystifications. 

 

Baluchistan is a mountainous region bifurcated by the Pakistan-Iran border, 
just as Pakhtun lands are divided between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Baluch 
nationalists have long resented the often brutal control exercised by the 
Iranian and Pakistani governments. Historically, though, whereas the Baluch 
leaders in Iran were politically conservative, the main Baluch tribal leaders 
in Pakistan were all progressive, in some cases close to the traditional 
communist currents of the sub-continent. Before the Iranian clerical revolution 
of 1979 there was even talk of unifying the two provinces as a self-governing 
republic.

 

I was involved in many discussions with Baluch tribal leaders as well as 
radical activists at the time. There was an independent Marxist current that 
spanned the tribes, led by leftist Balauch intellectuals and their non-Baluch 
allies from the Panjab and Sindh provinces. Their magazine, Jabal (‘Mountain’) 
carried some of the most interesting debates on the national question, replete 
with reference to Lenin’s texts on national self-determination. The analogy of 
the Ethiopian-Eritrean divide was discussed non-stop. A leading figure, Murad 
Khan, argued that with the 1974 overthrow of the pro-imperialist Haile Selassie 
regime in Addis, the objective conditions of the Eritrean struggle had changed 
and the socio-economic situation in both regions could be developed in the 
direction of a class unity that transcended pure nationalism. Most Baluch also 
wanted some form of political autonomy, or failing that, independence. 

 

Full at:  https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/the-baluchistan-imbroglio

 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#28559): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/28559
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103844354/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to