Dennis points to the fundamental flaw in the so-called "tactical alliance" with an established bourgeois party against the "greater evil"-- If as the advocates claim such a maneuver leads to a strengthening of the prospects for an independent movement, that growing strength necessarily weakens the "lesser evil" while the economic conditions feeding reaction continue or strengthen. So when is there ever the moment for breaking the "tactical" alliance that doesn't jeopardize the "preservation" of "bourgeois democratic rights"?
That is one of the reasons I asked Walter Daum to provide an example where an established socialist party advocated a "tactical alliance" with a bourgeois party that worked to the advantage of "workers' self-organization" (since the end of WW2)? Or, short version, is there an exit strategy? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#32998): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/32998 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109066560/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
