I've seen some DSA reactions. No matter, though, because that masssive DSA of 100,000 with a large engaged membership is probably a thing of the past.
Btw, the DSA had no internal discipline about electoral politics. There existed no reason for members who wanted to run independent local campaigns as socialists in their community not to do so. In fact, had they done so, it would have been hard for the local DSA leaders to have openly opposed them. In fact, there were lots of socialists who said they favored it and became members. I think it would have made a lot of sense for them to have done so and demonstrated the viability of such campaigns. Why this did not happen is beyond me. But I suspect that the time this could have accomplished something is far in the rear view mirror at this point. Like so much else. Mark L. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#33477): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33477 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109441085/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
