On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 06:57 PM, David Walters wrote:

> 
> ... *no one* continues to claim or charge that Stalin had Kirov killed. I
> don't know who does *except in the most informal of discussions.* it was of
> course a completely understandable assumption in the 1930s but that is all
> it was, an assumption. Even Trotsky isn't hard and fast on the question.
> 
> 

"most informal of discussions"?! What a weasel phrase. "No one"?! Just put 
stalin killed kirov inurl:communist into Google. From one of many items that 
come up:
Stalin had Kirov, the Leningrad party chief, assassinated and used it as a 
pretext to arrest his opponents.
https://communist.red/the-moscow-trials-a-lesson-from-history/ Oct. 2012


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#34701): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/34701
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110691249/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to