> On Feb 22, 2025, at 8:24 PM, Marv Gandall via groups.io
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> While the example of DeepSeek has shown us that China can still be
> extraordinarily adaptable within these constraints, essentially developing a
> more efficient copy of ChatGPT using much less resources (and third-tier
> Nvidia chips),
I have not seen anything yet that proved the claims on efficiency. There is
this article from a web design company,
https://www.digidop.com/blog/deepseek-vs-chatgpt?utm_source=chatgpt.com. But I
am still looking for sources on DeepSeek's supposed efficiency gains over, for
example, OpenAI.
thanks, Mark
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35360): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35360
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111336789/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
