Israel’s war on Gaza has made genocide an accepted weapon of war. We’re 
already seeing it in Sudan. – Mondoweiss
Israel’s genocide in Gaza set a global norm that views extermination as a 
'natural' part of how nations and paramilitary groups wage war. We are already 
seeing this in Sudan.


The following is an English translation of the opening editorial of the Winter 
2026 issue of Majallat al-Dirasat al-Filastiniyyah (the Arabic-language Journal 
of Palestine Studies, published by the Institute for Palestine Studies). 
Mondoweiss has reprinted the English version with permission. Translated by 
Muhammad Ali Khalidi.

In the editorial of the Fall 2025 issue of Majallat al-Dirasat 
al-Filastiniyyah, we laid out the following analysis:


“What has happened and is happening in this war waged by Israel on the 
Palestinian people is completely recasting international political relations 
and is inaugurating a new world order.  It is also forging a new vocabulary of 
war, which will become the basis of new wars, constituting a break with the 
wars of previous times and places. States have clearly picked up on the signal 
that red lines can now be transgressed. Future combatants will see a ‘golden’ 
opportunity in light of the world’s silence regarding the crimes against the 
Palestinian people, and will reason that if such crimes recur in future wars 
and conflicts, the world will remain silent.”


In composing, analyzing, and discussing this text, we had expected that this 
would transpire only after a long time had elapsed. The blood of Gaza has not 
yet dried, the devastation has not yet been repaired, and people remain without 
shelter, clinic, or school, yet this prognosis has already come to pass. The 
ceasefire is merely an attempt to quell the international movement opposing 
Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinians, and to rehabilitate Israel 
politically and reposition it militarily.

Two years of annihilation met by unprecedented complicity and quiescence in 
official circles have raised the bar of violent criminality in war. The war 
that broke out in Sudan before October 2023 spiraled out of control once the 
genocidal character of Israel’s aggression in Gaza came to light, in keeping 
with the deathly silence against the daily crimes against civilians.

What is happening in Gaza and Sudan can be considered a kind of contagion of 
extreme genocidal violence to achieve military and political goals. The party 
carrying out genocide in both cases authorizes the killing of civilians without 
the need to consider international condemnation. In Israel’s case, the 
extermination is a culmination of a long series of genocidal actions, including 
the massacres of 1948 in Palestine, the Bahr al-Baqar primary school massacre 
in Egypt (1970), the massacre of Qana in Lebanon (1996), Operation “Defensive 
Shield” in the West Bank (2002), among many others — to say nothing of the 
ongoing Judaization and colonization of Palestine.


The war in Gaza has firmly established that the international legal, moral, and 
political order contains a double standard and was never meant to serve the 
needs of weaker nations and societies.


Once these Israeli actions reached their murderous zenith in the present, 
challenging international law, other forces around the world were given license 
to carry out similar criminal actions. The destruction of people and 
livelihoods has become the “natural” conduct of many states, as well as 
military and paramilitary forces. These actions of genocide and annihilation 
have been carried out under the usual pretexts of war, politics, antisemitism, 
and “existential threats.”

The world has not drawn any lessons or taken any action in the face of the 
murder of tens of thousands of civilians in Palestine, Sudan, and other 
so-called “conflict zones.”  The war in Gaza has firmly established that the 
international legal, moral, and political order contains a double standard and 
was never meant to serve the needs of weaker nations and societies. Rather, the 
international order was founded to enable the devastation of these societies 
once the great powers succeeded in eviscerating its content by demonizing those 
who preside over it.

What is happening in Gaza and the other genocides in the region should stir the 
sages of the world to uphold the international order that is meant to protect 
vulnerable people in times of conflict, and to safeguard international courts 
and juridical bodies. This should be seen as a precautionary measure to disrupt 
future genocidal parties, so that annihilation of peoples does not become an 
instrument of war.

The war has not yet ended in Palestine, Lebanon, or Syria, and the drums of war 
are still beating in Israel and presaging the opening of new fronts along its 
borders and in the region at large. 

The deceitful “20-Point Plan” announced on September 29, 2025, by U.S. 
President Donald Trump only twisted the knife in the wound. It can only be 
described as a diabolical attempt to undermine the unparalleled international 
solidarity with Palestine, which has resulted in Israel being ostracized and 
branded a genocidal state.

Israel’s war on Gaza has not stopped; the ceasefire that took effect on October 
10, 2025, was merely a continuation of war by other means. In essence, there is 
a clear decision to continue the war, since it embodies the policy of 
extermination embraced by the current rulers of Israel. It is also keeping them 
in power; that is what saves them from committees of inquiry, prosecution, 
resignation, and elections. The pretext of an “existential threat” deployed by 
the Israeli system of propaganda and hasbara is an attempt to distract the 
Israeli public; it is also an effective tool to achieve their genocidal aims 
and to eliminate the right of self-determination and the right of return for 
Palestinians.

To be sure, after the ceasefire announcement, the daily death toll for 
Palestinians declined, as did the number of bombs falling on the people and the 
remaining buildings in Gaza. But the war has not really come to an end. As of 
December 8, 2025, 60 days after the ceasefire took effect, 738 ceasefire 
violations had been recorded, including 205 incidents of firing on civilians, 
38 incursions by military vehicles into inhabited areas, 358 bombings of 
civilians, 138 acts of destruction of civilian buildings, resulting in the 
killing of 386 Palestinians, to say nothing of the prevention of entry of basic 
necessities into Gaza, in clear violation of the original ceasefire agreement.

Meanwhile, in the West Bank, the situation deteriorates by the day. Special 
forces units of the Israeli military recently executed two men, al-Muntasir 
Billah Abdullah, 26, and Yusuf ‘Asasah, 37, in the Jabal Abu Dhayr neighborhood 
in Jenin, after they had surrendered by raising their hands in the air, clearly 
indicating that they were not going to resist arrest.

This act of execution was just the latest in a series in our recent history. It 
brings to mind the incident of the “Bus 300 Affair” (or “Kav 300 Affair”) in 
1984, the execution of Abdul Fattah Sharif by Israeli soldier Elor Azarya in 
Hebron in 2016, and the cold-blooded assassination of journalist Shireen Abu 
Akleh in May 2022 in Jenin.  

With this background in place, it should come as no surprise that Israeli 
parliamentarians are competing to introduce legislation in the Knesset that 
would authorize the execution of Palestinian prisoners. Such legislation would 
provide legal cover for a practice that occurs routinely at checkpoints, as 
well as in mosques, homes, and on the streets.

In Lebanon, too, Israel persists in violating the cessation of hostilities 
agreement that came into effect on November 27, 2024, with daily attacks, as 
well as with its continued occupation of several outposts in southern Lebanon.

In Syria, meanwhile, in the wake of the collapse of the Asad regime in December 
2024, Israel has attacked over 300 positions of the Syrian military, destroying 
some of its capabilities. It has simultaneously announced the termination of 
the disengagement agreement of May 31, 1974, and infiltrated and occupied 
Syrian territory, carrying out almost daily incursions into Syrian villages, 
attacking, seizing captives, and (sometimes) withdrawing.

All this has occurred alongside Israeli strikes on Yemen, threats to hit Iraq, 
and the wide-scale attack on Iran. The assault on the Qatari capital of Doha 
occurred despite the role that Qatar has played in attempting to mediate a 
diplomatic agreement to end the war in Gaza. 

It should have become obvious that, by pursuing this policy of aggression, 
Israel has embraced the Trump doctrine of “peace through strength.”  This is 
borne out in both Lebanon and Gaza under the guise of a ceasefire, in the West 
Bank through the intimidation of the population, and in Syria by consecrating 
expansion and the imposition of “neutral” zones. 


What Israel and its backers want is the complete subjugation of its neighbors 
and the imposition of terms of surrender.


Similarly, Israel justified its attack on Doha on the pretext that it was 
targeting the Hamas negotiating delegation, sending a message to the entire 
region that it crosses red lines with abandon, in an attempt to impose a 
balance of power on the region. That was also one of the aims of Israel’s war 
on Iran, although Iran’s measured and proportionate response may have 
frustrated this goal, forcing the United States to intervene directly to end it 
decisively.

What Israel and its backers want is the complete subjugation of its neighbors 
and the imposition of terms of surrender on them, rather than a peaceful 
settlement with them.

The region has reached a boiling point, and the international community, in its 
apparent efforts to defuse the situation, is also attempting to recalibrate the 
balance of power in favor of the West, enshrining Israel as the overlord of the 
states of the region. Israel’s interests, along with those of a few other 
states, have come to determine the fate of the region’s nations, borders, and 
resources.

Editorial Committee of Majallat al-Dirasat al-Filastiniyya
 
Majallat al-Dirasat al-Filastiniyya (MDF) is a peer-reviewed periodical 
published quarterly by the Institute for Palestine Studies since 1990. MDF is 
printed in Beirut and simultaneously reprinted in Ramallah for distribution in 
Palestine, Arab countries, and globally. MDF is a venue that specializes in the 
question of Palestine, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and relevant international 
issues.

  


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#39826): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39826
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116923683/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to