January 23, 2026
From Instinct to Theory: A Left in Search of Itself ( 
https://www.counterpunch.org/2026/01/23/from-instinct-to-theory-a-left-in-search-of-itself/
 )
Biljana Vankovska ( https://www.counterpunch.org/author/bljvnkv2929/ )
( 
https://www.counterpunch.org/2026/01/23/from-instinct-to-theory-a-left-in-search-of-itself/print/
 )
The author as a young Pioneer.
Having spent roughly half my life in a socialist system (with Yugoslav 
characteristics), I am nonetheless struck by how few consistent leftists remain 
today in my region. Honestly, I even struggle to define myself — beyond the 
broad label of a leftist. The events that unfolded in my (now defunct) homeland 
were of such magnitude that there was barely any space left for ideological 
debate. Burdened by war, hatred, fear, and plunder, we slipped almost unnoticed 
into the phase euphemistically called “transition.” According to our Western 
mentors (who were quick to brand us barbarians for a war they themselves had 
largely helped ignite) it was supposed to lead us to “real democracy.”
I am well aware of dissidents (mostly Soviet, but also from other former 
socialist countries in Europe) who spent their lives wandering between systems: 
disillusioned with socialism and its distortions, they went West in search of 
genuine freedom, only to return even more disenchanted. I was too young to play 
the role of a dissident. And to be honest, as a descendant of the working 
class, someone who, thanks to equal opportunities and personal ability, was 
able to climb the ladder into academic life, I felt no disappointment with 
socialism.
My father, Ljube Vankovski was an autodidact without formal higher education; 
he worked in a printing house with lungs full of lead fumes. But he read 
philosophy, wrote poetry, and was politically active to the extent that he was 
briefly arrested by the secret police for allegedly spreading “hostile 
propaganda.” It was a traumatic experience for our family. He was soon released 
without charges. A file remained, but I never sought to see it; I never wanted 
to know who had denounced him. While I was studying law and reciting my lessons 
on Yugoslavia’s system of self-management and delegated assemblies, my father 
who had practical experience as a workers’ representative in the city council, 
would tell me bluntly: “This won’t work. This dysfunctional system will 
collapse.” I didn’t believe him. My textbooks insisted that Yugoslavia was 
closest to the ideal of the Paris Commune, a socialism with a human face. When 
Marshal Tito was at the height of his international fame, touring the world 
aboard the Galeb , greeted with grand ceremonies from North Korea to who knows 
where, he would grumble: “Instead of handling things at home, he’s traveling 
the world.” When Tito died, I genuinely mourned him. Together with my fellow 
students, and without any coertion, I went to pay my respects at the House of 
Flowers, his final resting place. My father grumbled again, as if sensing that 
something terrible was coming. He died a few years after Tito and did not live 
to see his predictions come true (although I believe even he would have been 
shocked by the scale of violence and hatred that spread through the country 
like wildfire).
Yet he never turned against Marxism, which he studied independently, far beyond 
school textbooks. I never heard my parents utter a single bitter word about 
their lives as members of the working class, let alone claim that capitalism 
was the answer to the flaws of Yugoslav socialism. From today’s perspective, I 
think they were wise enough to see that the class which claimed to represent 
the proletariat as a whole had in fact drifted away from working people and 
become a socialist bourgeoisie. They criticized the system and the caste that 
betrayed the socialist ideal in which they had seen a genuinely emancipatory 
future for their children.
The author with her father, Ljube Vankovski.
Raised in the spirit of Yugoslavism and socialism, and with the sincerity and 
naivety of a child, I was attached to them. You can imagine what the double 
loss of 1991 meant. Independent Macedonia was neither truly independent nor 
socially just. Built on national self-determination and refusal to participate 
in wars (“oasis of peace”), but simultaneously on criminal privatization, the 
destructive recipes of the Washington Consensus, and similar policies, 
Macedonia lost everything it had built over previous decades. Every new step 
toward so-called Europeanization meant de-Macedonization, the loss of national 
and human dignity and the right to be at home in one’s own country. Worst of 
all, a new class of overnight tycoons emerged, i.e. comprador elite enriched 
through the theft of collective wealth; the population was pauperized, 
humiliated, and made dependent on crumbs thrown from above. In these conditions 
grew a generation that called itself “the children of transition”; a generation 
that neither experienced socialism nor witnessed any genuine democratic 
progress. Those older people like myself (“fossils” of the old system, now 
demonized and erased from collective memory), naturally gravitate toward them, 
forming a fragile but existing ground for leftist ideas and praxis.
In the former Yugoslavia, we lived much better and freer (often on credit and 
IMF loans, to be honest) than people in the rest of the Eastern Bloc. 
Understandably, their experiences differed from ours. We didn’t even have a 
“headquarters” in Moscow or membership in the Warsaw Pact. Yet after all the 
devastation brought by capitalism, I somehow hoped that memories of socialism 
would converge. I wrongly assumed that at least some nostalgia, if not a 
leftist ideology, had survived. I was proven wrong.
At a gathering of colleagues from Central and Eastern Europe, I made no secret 
of being a leftist, nor of seeing Chinese socialism as an inspiration—not a 
model, but a stimulus. My interlocutors responded with confusion, and some with 
outright hostility toward the very mention of socialism. One colleague jokingly 
(yet kindly) whispered that he hadn’t seen a living communist in years (we were 
in Beijing!). The greatest understanding came from a Greek colleague, who 
congratulated me on the courage to say what others avoided and recognized me as 
ideologically close. Let me stress this irony: someone who never lived under 
socialism felt closer to me than some who had.
The “Cold War 2.0” is shifting from geopolitical rivalry into ideological 
intolerance. Fascist tendencies no longer hide. Socialist and communist parties 
are being banned, more or less violently in the ‘democratic West’. The furthest 
left position still tolerated is social democracy, which itself increasingly 
drifts toward liberalism. Under these conditions, it becomes clear that we will 
learn more about socialism and leftist struggle from the so-called Third World 
or Global South, especially from countries suffering under U.S. imperialism, 
such as Venezuela, Cuba, parts of India, even Vietnam.
Leftism is in decline not only due to external pressure and opportunism, but 
also because of ignorance and intellectual laziness. Ah, yes! And the betrayal 
of the so-called Western Marxists that we once admired (something that Gabriel 
Rockhill deconstructed brilliantly). For those of us at a more mature age, this 
means taking two steps back in order to move one forward. For younger 
generations who are already “walking the walk,” it is a matter of basic 
education rather than instinct. We must return to theory we once took for 
granted and failed to respect. Above all, we must study and learn from 
anti-colonial critique. What we need is a global “party school” of socialism.
How to build socialism is another and more difficult story. But without 
theoretical grounding and a clear understanding of the world, we cannot hope to 
change it. Once again, we face the old dilemmas: is socialism possible in one 
country, or does it require a global revolution? On Chinese TV, the popular 
anchor asks her guest: is China truly (or still) a socialist country. In the 
dominant narrative born in the West, Cuba and Venezuela are presented as proof 
that socialism doesn’t work, without acknowledging the heroism of their 
societies in resisting decades of ruthless imperial sanctions.
It is time to relearn Marxism, socialism, and leftist struggles from around the 
world; to draw lessons from past and present fights against oppression; and to 
resist the proto-fascist capitalism that once again threatens our lives and 
communities. Too many have lost their moral and ideological compass, shaped by 
the very systems they seek to challenge.
Let us reclaim our ideas, our knowledge, and our courage – and imagine, 
together, a truly emancipatory future.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#40369): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/40369
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/117460878/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to