---- Forwarded Message ----- From: Africa Is a Country 
<[email protected]>To: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 at 08:54:21 AM 
PDTSubject: Weekend Special, Apr 20: Comrade Leo?
 
View in Browser
  The Israel-US-Iran war, green spaces in Abuja, a filmic reflection on 
development + more. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
| 
| 
| 
| 
|  |

 |


| 
| 
Apr 20th
 |

 |

 |


| 
| 
| 
Comrade Leo?
 |

 |


| 
|  |

 |

 |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| 
|  |


Nossa Senhora de Muxima. Image via Hoteis Angola.

| 
|  |

 |


This past Saturday morning, Pope Leo XIV stood inside a church called Our Lady 
of Muxima, on the Angolan coast. It is a Marian sanctuary, more than 500 years 
old, built at the edge of the Atlantic. Enslaved Africans were brought here to 
be baptised before they were loaded onto ships to the Americas. Whether they 
were asked, whether the sacrament was offered or imposed, the record does not 
say with any care. What the record does say is that Muxima was a waystation of 
the Middle Passage—one of the places where a civilization carried out what it 
had decided, at the highest levels of theology and statecraft, was acceptable.

I am a lapsed Catholic, one who in teenagehood almost considered the priesthood 
(but judge me not, so did Chris Hani. And, er, Stalin). I say this to give 
context, because it shapes the specific kind of attention I have been paying to 
Leo’s 11-day trip through Algeria, Cameroon, Angola, and Equatorial Guinea—the 
attention of someone who grew up inside a particular vocabulary and left it, or 
left most of it, and now finds himself watching someone speak that vocabulary 
with an unusual degree of precision and asks what he is supposed to do with 
that. There is something that keeps pulling in a direction I cannot entirely 
explain.

What has been pulling me is not the political drama, though the drama is real. 
It is a sentence Leo delivered at the presidential palace in Luanda, in a 
speech that was otherwise full of the formal diplomatic address these occasions 
require:

| 
Without joy there is no renewal; without interiority there is no liberation; 
without encounter there is no politics; without the other there is no justice.
 |


It is a sentence a philosopher might write—it has the shape of a Hegelian 
ladder, each term depending on the one before it. But it was delivered to a 
head of state in a palace, at a moment when the man who said it was 
simultaneously being called weak and political by the US President for having 
suggested that a war being prosecuted in his name was unjust. There is 
something to sit with in that: the insistence on interiority, on joy, on 
encounter, as the ground of politics—spoken from inside the very arrangements 
that have most systematically destroyed those things.

In earlier editions of this newsletter, I have been trying to work through what 
Charles Taylor calls inarticulacy—the systematic erosion of the moral 
vocabulary through which people might say what they actually want and why. The 
conditions of modern capitalism and our hyper-mediated, bureaucratic existence 
actively produce this erosion. We sense that something is missing. We reach for 
the nearest available language of opposition, but it turns out to be something 
else that reproduces the maladies that afflict us, but dressed in different 
garb. We are scratching in the wrong place because we have lost the words for 
where it actually hurts.

What strikes me about Leo’s language—not just in Luanda, but across everything 
he has said and written since his election—is that he seems to have kept the 
words, or recovered them. His first apostolic exhortation, Dilexi te, denounces 
what he calls “the dictatorship imposed by economic disparity” and insists that 
caring for the poor means combating the systemic roots of poverty, not just 
performing individual works of charity. He says the poor are not there by 
chance. He says there is no determinism that condemns us to inequality—the root 
problem is not a lack of resources but unjust distribution that can be changed 
“with morality and honesty.” He criticizes ideologies that uphold the unbridled 
freedom of the marketplace and financial speculation, which falsely promise 
that a free market will automatically resolve poverty. He describes a wealthy 
elite living in a bubble of comfort and luxury alongside the poor who are 
increasingly numerous, and calls this contrast intolerable for Christians.

We are used to hearing clergy speak the language of personal virtue or 
individual conversion, but Pope Leo was speaking, with surprising clarity, the 
language of structure—of systems that produce outcomes, of arrangements that 
are chosen and can be unchosen. Capitalism is a displaced religion, carrying 
its own liturgy, sacraments, and eschatology. What Leo XIV is doing, in the 
tradition of Catholic social teaching running from Leo XIII’s Rerum novarum to 
liberation theology (a tradition he would know well, having spent three decades 
being shaped by the Peruvian church of which Gustavo Gutiérrez was a major 
figure), is performing a counter‑exorcism—insisting that the liturgy of capital 
is not natural, not inevitable, not the final word on what human life is for. 
“There is no determinism that condemns us to inequality.” That sentence could 
have been written by Marx. The fact that it comes from a pope does not make it 
any less true or any less rare in the current landscape of institutional 
utterance, marked by moral incoherence.

In Yaoundé, Leo told university students that when simulation becomes the norm, 
the human capacity for discernment weakens, social bonds close in on 
themselves, and we come to live in bubbles impermeable to one another. This 
language is strikingly Baudrillardian. Baudrillard’s great insight, developed 
across the 1980s and largely vindicated since (as I have covered here), was 
that we had passed into a condition of pure simulation—a world in which images 
no longer pointed to anything beyond themselves, in which representation 
swallowed reality so completely that the outside ceased to exist. The US was 
his central exhibit: not a country among others but a total environment, a 
dream that had forgotten it was one. Leo was describing exactly the world 
Baudrillard mapped. But where Baudrillard arrived at a kind of cold, glittering 
fatalism, Leo insists on the opposite: that simulation is a condition, not a 
destiny; that the capacity for genuine encounter remains available; that the 
account is not closed.

Still, there is a complication I do not want to slide past. Cameroon’s 
President Paul Biya has been in office since 1982. As David Ngong recently 
pointed out on our pages, every papal visit to Cameroon has coincided with a 
moment when the Biya regime needed external legitimacy—the failed coup of 1984, 
the rigged election of 1992, the constitutional revision of 2008. The Vatican 
was warned. It went anyway. Leo held his masses; Biya and his wife were, as 
they always are on these occasions, center stage. The institution that speaks 
of joy, encounter, and the systemic roots of poverty is also the institution 
that keeps arriving to sanctify arrangements that produce the opposite. This is 
not a new problem—it is, in some sense, the problem—and it does not resolve 
itself because the language being spoken at presidential palaces is genuine.

What I am trying to hold is both things at once: the sentence about interiority 
and encounter and what they require for politics to be real, and the image of 
the man who said it standing in a room with a man who has spent forty years 
demonstrating that politics survives perfectly well without any of those 
things. Institutions are not the same as the ideas they carry. The ideas can 
survive the institution’s failures. Whether they do depends partly on whether 
people outside the institution are willing to receive them without accepting 
the institution’s account of itself, which is, I think, roughly the position of 
the lapsed Catholic, and perhaps also of the secular left, and perhaps also of 
the African traditions that have been in tension with Catholic universalism 
since the first missionaries arrived.

Agostinho Neto, the Angolan poet and independence leader, wrote from within 
that tension—the Christianity of the colonizer refracted through the experience 
of the colonized, the language of the oppressor used to name the oppression. 
His poem “Western Civilisation” describes a man crushed by the weight of 
someone else’s idea of progress, surviving on almost nothing, dreaming still. 
That Leo is standing in Neto’s country, at a site that concentrates the full 
weight of that history, while simultaneously insisting that there is no 
determinism that condemns us to inequality—the juxtaposition is almost too 
much. I do not know if Leo has read Neto, but it does not matter. They are 
pointing at the same wound from different sides of the same wall.

What Leo is doing, imperfectly and contradictorily and within all the 
constraints of the institution he leads, is making an argument about what the 
human being is and what she needs. She needs joy that is not bought. She needs 
interiority that is not performed. She needs encounter that is not optimized. 
She needs to be seen as someone from whom the world has not yet exhausted the 
capacity for surprise. And she needs systems that are structured so these 
things are possible, rather than ones that actively work to prevent them. 
Material poverty and spiritual poverty are not two conditions but one—produced 
by the same arrangements, requiring the same transformation. Faith, in this 
account, does not supplement the social from outside; it names the social’s 
deepest requirement, which is that persons be seen as irreducible to their 
function, that joy and interiority and encounter are not luxuries but the 
conditions under which genuine human life becomes possible at all.

I did not expect to find this argument being made, however imperfectly, from an 
altar at Muxima. I am not sure what to do with the finding. But the place where 
it actually hurts—the thing we keep reaching for the words for—I think he is 
pointing at it. That seems worth naming, even from across a distance of lapsed 
faith and institutional wariness, even at the risk of receiving the message 
without the institution that carries it.

– William Shoki, editor

| 
|  |

 |


| 
| Shop |

 |


|  |


| 
|  |

 |


| 
Across our vast land
 |

 |


| 
| 
| 
The debts our parents left us
 |


The language of fiscal consolidation is meant to sound inevitable. But for 
Kenya’s informal workers, the human cost is anything but abstract.

| 
The demographic dividend no one wants to pay
 |


Although increasingly celebrated as an asset, Africa’s youth remain locked out 
of power and decent work.

| 
Fields of dependency
 |


As the US-Israel war on Iran disrupts fertilizer supply, Africa’s reliance on 
imported inputs exposes the deeper political economy driving food insecurity.
 |


| 
| 
Whose progress?
 |


A new documentary reveals how Ethiopia’s manufacturing push redistributes land, 
labor, and opportunity—delivering gains for some while displacing others.

| 
More commerce than chaos
 |


In Johannesburg’s Jeppe precinct, what looks like disorder is in fact a dense, 
transnational system of trade, labor, and survival at the heart of the global 
economy.

| 
The Corner Flag
 |


Look out for our new sports newsletter and subscribe to African Five-a-Side via 
YouTube or podcast.
 |

 |


| 
| 
|  |

 |


| 
Something extra
 |


|  |


We are excited to announce the international premiere of our first 
feature-length documentary“After Oil” at the New York African Film Festival 
this upcoming May 24th. The screening will take place at the Brooklyn Academy 
of Music.

| 
|  |

 |


| 
| Donate |

 |



 |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|  | Twitter |


|  | Instagram |


|  | TikTok |


|  | Africa Is a Country |

 |

 |


| 
Africa Is a Country
388 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn NY 11217
 |

 |

 |

 |

  

  


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#41519): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/41519
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/118928007/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to