Do I need to enter a bug report for this? Is there a bugzilla for mason? elrod
On 6/22/06, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Mark Elrod wrote: > > > For instance if I access a page /foo/bar/baz.html which has a a call > > as defined above and I have an /autohandler that does this: > > > > <& /include/body.html &> > > > > and then inside /include/body.html do this: > > > > $m->call_next; > > > > The /foo/bar/baz.html component is called eventually but then causes > > an error because SELF:method resolves to /include/body.html:method > > rather than /foo/bar/baz.html:method which is what I would expect. > > The problem is that $m->call_next is not resetting the base_comp, > because internally, it does $m->comp($m->fetch_next) which is equivalent > to the work-around to avoid changing the base_comp. Using $m->call_next > from outside the autohandler is not very common, but it is something we > explicitly support. > > So I think that $m->call_next should be fixed to reset base_comp to > request_comp each time it is called. > > Jon, Dave, do you agree? > > ~ John Williams > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
